[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2003/01/15
[#722] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/20

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:

[#740] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/21

Hi,

[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or

23 messages 2003/01/20
[#728] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/20

Hi,

[#743] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2003/01/21

On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#767] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/22

[#768] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — dblack@... 2003/01/22

Hi --

Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-01-23 18:34:46 UTC
List: ruby-core #784
Hi,

In message "Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted"
    on 03/01/24, Matt Armstrong <[email protected]> writes:

|> I consider "binding" as "a collection of bindings" in your term.
|> For example, when we say "Emacs key binding", it means "a collection
|> of key-function bindings very similar to one of Emacs".  Am I wrong?
|
|I think so.  That sounds strange in English.  It is like saying an
|"object" is a "collection of objects."

Parhaps you're right.  I'm not an English speaker anyway.
But still, I don't like the word "Environment".  It's too generic.

							matz.

In This Thread