[#686] Wall compilation — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi everybody,
[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:38:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#708] Documentation for thread.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi ruby-core,
[#719] nd_end and NODE_NEWLINE (fwd) — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>
I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or
Hi,
On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi --
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:
Gavin Sinclair <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
[email protected] (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:34:46 +0900
[#730] Comments on matrix.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi -core,
[#757] Extensions for Time and ParseDate — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Eric and I have been hacking around and we can't stand the lack of
[#759] Adding Test::Unit to CVS — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Matz has already given me the go-ahead to add Test::Unit to CVS, but I
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > |4. I don't know what's supposed to be the difference between site-install > |and install, but the directory that "install" installs into is not the one > |my extension was installing into before mkmf came here. > > The one install the extension should decide whether it is going to be > installed by site-install or install. site-install was originally > introduced for the extensions and libraries not controlled under > platform's packaging system. BTW, I implemented a mimic of Perl's vendor-install for 1.7. It separates notion of 'install' to two different components: one for prepackaged extensions which are provided by Ruby itself (stdlibs) and second for vendor's prepackaged extensions. In this case site-install is used for local extensions, not controlled under packaging system. For example, for ALT Linux it looks like: Places where Ruby itself is installed: archdir = /usr/lib/ruby/1.7/i586-linux-gnu rubylibdir = /usr/share/ruby/1.7 Site-specific installation paths: sitearchdir = /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.7/i586-linux-gnu sitedir = /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby sitelibdir = /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/1.7 Vendor-specific pre-packaged extensions go to: vendorarchdir = /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.7/i586-linux-gnu vendordir = /usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby As you may see, there is also a separation between libdir and datadir as required by FHS for object code and data files. Would you be interested in seeing this patch? It is pretty compact. -- / Alexander Bokovoy --- You know, the difference between this company and the Titanic is that the Titanic had paying customers.