[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2003/01/15
[#722] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/20

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:

[#740] Re: [RFC] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/21

Hi,

[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>

I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or

23 messages 2003/01/20
[#728] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/01/20

Hi,

[#743] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — "Pit Capitain" <pit@...> 2003/01/21

On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#767] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2003/01/22

[#768] Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — dblack@... 2003/01/22

Hi --

Re: [Patch] Wall compilation

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2003-01-16 12:58:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #703
Hi,

At Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:22:01 +0900,
Michal Rokos wrote:
> >>>What about ((void)0) ?
> >>
> >>	Again - gcc warns about 'code has no effect'...
> > I've used this (void)0 trick many times, we have to replace
> > them all to make gcc 3.2.2 quiet?
> > Anyhow, what it defines assert() in <assert.h> if NDEBUG?
> 
> 	You're right - as usually :))

Possibly, gcc 3.2.2 always complains about assert() if NDEBUG?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread