[#686] Wall compilation — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi everybody,
[#688] mkmf.rb - add files to clean and distclean targets — Michal Rokos <michal@...>
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Michal Rokos wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:16:39AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:38:00PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#708] Documentation for thread.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi ruby-core,
[#719] nd_end and NODE_NEWLINE (fwd) — Chad Fowler <chad@...>
[#724] Symbols: More Functionality Wanted — Ryan Pavlik <rpav@...>
I've been discussing this for a bit on #ruby-lang on OPN (or freenode or
Hi,
On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi --
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 6:28:04 AM, dblack wrote:
Gavin Sinclair <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
[email protected] (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 03:34:46 +0900
[#730] Comments on matrix.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Hi -core,
[#757] Extensions for Time and ParseDate — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Eric and I have been hacking around and we can't stand the lack of
[#759] Adding Test::Unit to CVS — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...>
Matz has already given me the go-ahead to add Test::Unit to CVS, but I
Nathaniel Talbott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:56 AM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Re: Symbols: More Functionality Wanted
Hi -- I seem not to have gotten anything prior to this post in this thread, so I'm kind of commenting on all of it in a lump. I hope it's not terribly out of context. On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Pit Capitain wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2003 at 15:49, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > > > In message "Symbols: More Functionality Wanted" > > > on 03/01/20, Ryan Pavlik <[email protected]> writes: > > > | (... bind values to symbols ...) > > > Interesting idea, but I feel like they are responsibility of Binding, > > > not Symbol. For example, > > > b = binding() > > > b.bind(:a, 2) > > > b.value(:a) Binding#bind doesn't sound right to me. I would say either: - bind a symbol to a value, or - add a symbol to a binding but not "bind a symbol to a binding." At least, that's what my language sense tells me. Binding#add, maybe? David -- David Alan Black home: [email protected] work: [email protected] Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav