@mupan@digitalcourage.social avatar mupan , to random German

R.I.P. Mr , social media and university debate preacher of . Shooting him made him a for sure. So if they did it to stop his poison be spread I don’t see a chance it worked. Thus they committed a and became for nought. I mean, Kirk is guilty of , but a victim’s guilt is never an excuse nor a justification.

When Dietrich gave his two cents in the discussion if assassinating Hitler was ethically permitted he said they were guilty either way: Let the go on with their agenda, murdering millions of human bodies and souls, or, kill the Fuehrer. So, he said, if killing one spared many humans’ lifes he would choose to kill the one. But, he continued, an isolated tyrannicide wasn’t wise politically, because killing the head alone wouldn’t stop the Fascist machine. (All paraphrased by me)

Kirk wasn’t as important as Hitler, of course, but the same weighing of the real political effect should have been done here.