What the ruling class calls "progress" is not inevitable! 🎉
As far as I am aware (please correct me if I'm wrong), this is the first rebuke these sidewalk vehicle companies have received from any municipal government. Hopefully the first of many.
I went to the meeting last week that the alderman hosted which was discussed in the article. There were representatives from Coco and Serve at the meeting. They made highly the highly questionable claim that they were taking cars off the road and used this to say their sidewalk vehicles are safer than cars, so they are making the city safer. I asked why they are comparing their vehicles to cars rather than ebikes considering deliveries in dense cities are largely done via ebike...
... They couldn't provide any data to back up their assertion that deliveries are done by car in Chicago. They said Uber might have that data but that data is private. This concerned the alderman's staffer who said they needed that data to evaluate the impacts of these sidewalk vehicles and figure out what policy objectives these sidewalk vehicles might impact.
Their arguments fall apart so easily from even the slightest scrutiny.
Here is what I put in the feedback form for comments after the meeting:
'These vehicles bring all harms and no benefits to the community. They only benefit the companies inflicting them upon us. The people of Chicago are under no obligation to accept or accommodate them in any way.
The company representatives explained how these vehicles are only used for short distance deliveries. These are the trips that are easiest to walk, thus these delivery vehicles don't have a reason to exist...
... Even if local restaurants earn revenue through this, we all lose something much more important: public spaces where we interact with other people. If we normalize getting restaurant food through these delivery vehicles instead of walking a few blocks to local restaurants, eventually we won't have local restaurants; we'll just have ghost kitchens where robots go in and out and all human interaction is removed. That would be a miserable city to live in...
... I strongly disagree with the suggestions to get something out of these companies by having them pay for sidewalk maintenance. I appreciate the alderman fighting for funding safe streets. The city should be funding sidewalk maintenance. Funding sidewalks by leasing them to companies would be form of privatization that would leave us so much worse off in the long run, much like the parking meter deal...
... We must not trade short term budget relief for normalizing privatization of public space and forever cluttering sidewalks with these obnoxious vehicles.
Revoke these companies' licenses ASAP and don't let them come back.'
I intentionally refuse the "robot" language these companies want us to use and call them "sidewalk vehicles" instead. The supposedly autonomous operation is a charade. They are driven remotely by humans.
Want to get these sidewalk vehicles out of your city? Organize! All it has taken to get to this point in Chicago is some guy registering a domain name, making a Google Form, and spreading it around. https://nosidewalkbots.org/
To clarify, is the GRUB menu you see from the USB drive or the internal drive? If it gets to the GRUB menu of the USB drive and fails to boot from that point, I have no idea. If it's not booting GRUB from the USB drive, there might be something in the firmware settings to get it to boot.
I saw one of those automated delivery robots for the first time while I was out running errands yesterday. The googly eye looking head lights did a lot to quell the urge to tip it over.
It politely waited for the people around it to get out of the way before moving, but that meant it was sitting in the curb cut while it waited for me to go past. That is likely to be problematic for wheelchair users unless it somehow is able to get out of their way reliably.
Another view, this time of it crossing a street. It has something resembling brake lights. It's using the cross walk and is halfway across with 4 seconds left on the light.
@hipsterelectron Out-of-touch nerds love to hate Signal and suggest "alternatives" that don't even come close because they've missed the point of why people use Signal.
we had to go to work, had to pay our rent and our bills, and no matter how often we wondered before "how did people just let Hitler come to power?" we learned the answer, by having to work for the people who want him to, by having to pay rent to the people who want him to, by spending our waking lives making profits for and paying the very people who plan to destroy us, by not having the time or the energy to fight something so banal to this world as a fascist takeover.
'For those of us in the West, we must make sure that the world does not return to normal. We cannot be lulled back to sleep by the temporary cessation of air strikes while the occupation continues. Israel cannot continue as if it did not commit the gravest crime of our generation. The hundreds of thousands of martyred and maimed Palestinians demand justice that cannot be denied.'
Has anyone got libwebrtc to build without Chromium nonsense? Surely Firefox and WebKit don't download gigabytes of Google stuff just to build libwebrtc? Does WebKit use libwebrtc?
bluhhhh, I don't think this is feasible. I can get those 9 GB down to 1 GB pretty easily, but crates.io has a size limit of 10 MB for .crate files... sigh...
I guess the libwebrtc source code could be provided in an archive that gets autodownloaded by build.rs, with an option to specify a path to the source archive with an environment variable. Ugly, but I think would make it feasible to build this crate on systems that don't provide network access during builds.
I wrote a script that gets the 9 GB of junk down to 689 MB of source code, which compresses down to a 101 MB .tar.xz file. Still not great but way better than 9 GB googleware
I'm looking for a job writing code that isn't evil. I'm looking for remote work hiring for US timezones. I have 10 years experience, primarily with crossplatform (Linux/Windows/macOS, but especially Linux) desktop applications in C++ and Rust. Recently I've been getting into embedded MCU programming. I'd like to focus on Rust, but am willing to touch C++ and/or C for money. My website has a list of projects I've worked on: https://be.place/code
personally i'm not planning to migrate from github any time soon. the people who i'd've lost on ethical grounds have self-selected out long ago, i have basically no lock-in besides very heavy reliance GH Actions (which have no viable replacement besides gitlab maybe) and i'm counting on the process of corporate death to take a few years until it starts to cause actual immediate problems