@openrisk@mastodon.social avatar openrisk , to random

The early Web had a quality that has been lost ever since: it was simple

Download , write some by hand and boom, the concept of a networked digital society is born.

It first started going pear shaped with . The complexity of a full blown database was not justified for most use cases. As proven decades later by the popularity of and approaches.

The final blow was when got into the act. Immense complexity for the simplest things became a moat

@robyn@yeg.bike avatar robyn , to random

> "Many personal website owners
deliberately choose inefficient methods
for updating their sites. They write
HTML by hand, upload files directly
via FTP, or maintain static sites that
require manual intervention for even
simple changes. These choices would
be considered backwards in a
professional context, but they serve
important psychological and creative
functions"

by @vale , in the current issue.

me and my site deployed via feel very seen

@blog@janvandenberg.blog avatar blog , to random Dutch

Gister schreef ik een stuk over statische site generators, en daarin staat de volgende zin in:

En ik zie hardcore bloggers er ook altijd over schrijven. SSG is all the rage.

De persoon die ik in mijn hoofd had toen ik die zin typte was Kev Quirk.

Ik lees zijn blog altijd met grote interesse en hij schreef de afgelopen week meerdere keren over SSGs. Het zaadje werd daar geplant.

Vormgeving […]

https://janvandenberg.blog/redenen-om-van-het-internet-te-houden/

@artlung@xoxo.zone avatar artlung , to random

If you consider yourself a member of the and use a static site generator which one(s) do you use? Doing some wiki gardening category-wise and want to document what we're missing since we get a fair number of questions about choosing and using SSGs. Thanks! https://indieweb.org/Category:SSG

@betazoid@pixelfed.social avatar betazoid , to random

I have created a static web gallery generator.

https://github.com/blitzgneisserin/staticwebgallery

The “sophistication” about it right now: the Python script extracts with the help of exiftool metadata from the photos and displays the info automatically on the web site. So far, it extracts the keywords from the photos and creates a tag cloud of them, which you can see on the landing page. If you click on a tag, you see the thumbnails of the photos that contain that keyword/tag as metadata. Click on a thumbnail to see the big photo, under the photo you can see a caption which is also automatically created from the extracted metadata, it’s composed of the name of the city, the name of the state and the capture date (datetimeoriginal).

Of course, my plans are much much bigger: the whole project was inspired by the Wordpress plugin Media Library Assistant and it’s metadata mapping capabilities - but I wanted this as a static web site. Here is an example of a gallery web site that uses Worpress/Media Library Assistant.

For all of this to work properly, of course the first step is to get the right metadata into your pictures, which you can do with Digikam, more precisely its tools GPS correlator and reverse geocoding - the latter creates actual location names from gps coordinates and saves them as metadata inside the photo.

screenshot of a static web gallery I created with my new static web gallery generator
screenshot of a static web gallery I created with my new static web gallery generator

ALT