Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

From: Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:33:38 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Andrea Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:23, Andrey Andreev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure about namespacing it in the first place, but otherwise I
>> agree with you - acronyms should be capitalised.
>
> What’s your objection? We either namespace it, or we have to add some weird prefix to avoid
> conflicts. I’d rather we not have the prefix.
>
> The global namespace is already plenty polluted. Sure, most extensions so far don’t use
> namespaces, but that’s because they were written before 5.3 came out. I think it’s time to move
> on. Users know what namespaces are now, I don’t think it’d cause problems.
>

I'm not objecting it really, just haven't had a detailed look at it
yet and so far there's no core/bundled extension that is namespaced
(the ever-present "consistency" argument ... *cough*).

Cheers,
Andrey.


Thread (55 messages)

« previous php.internals (#81828) next »