> On 29 Jan 2015, at 12:18, Crypto Compress <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> * Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
>
> possible points:
> - PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does
> - native implementations should be faster
I don’t see how that’s relevant: I’m talking here about the API, not the implementation. Why
should PHP’s HTTP API not be PSR-7?
> - PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without dependencies by every
> simple script
Also irrelevant, there’s no reason it couldn’t use PSR-7’s API.
> - PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten years
Fair point.
> - PSR-7 can be complementary to pecl_http not the other way around (c code can't use php
> code?)
Not necessarily true.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/