Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
From: Crypto Compress Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:18:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http References: 1 2 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?possible points: - PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does - PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without dependencies by every simple script - PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten years - PSR-7 can be complementary to pecl_http not the other way around (c code can't use php code?) - native implementations should be faster
Thread (55 messages)
« previous | php.internals (#81375) | next » |
---|