Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http

From: Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:18:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

* Why should we have our own HTTP API and not follow PSR-7?
possible points: - PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does - PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without dependencies by every simple script - PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten years - PSR-7 can be complementary to pecl_http not the other way around (c code can't use php code?) - native implementations should be faster

Thread (55 messages)

« previous php.internals (#81375) next »