plinky [he/him]

  • 1.05K Posts
  • 6.04K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 8th, 2022

help-circle
  • “Similar to the Broadcasting Code, this will ensure that news is reported accurately and impartially and audiences are protected against harmful or offensive material,” the government said. “Audiences will be able to complain to Ofcom if they see something concerning, and Ofcom will have powers to investigate, and take action, where they consider there has been a breach of the code.”

    that’s eh

    Under a new accessibility code covering the services, they will be subject to minimum requirements for accessibility features. For example, streamers will need to ensure that at least 80 percent of their total catalogue is subtitled, 10 percent is audio-described, and 5 percent is signed.

    that’s pog if it weren’t done by ai, but anyway .ass files to the rescue rat-salute to brave subtitlers








  • yes. why everyone is named volodymyr, smh. i think he has a fine depressive sociologist take. i legit can’t parse leftist people not seeing giant nazi shaped hole around which ukrainian nationalism is rotating (the azov guy is polling at 40% approval ffs), it’s fine to doubt russian motives around it, i doubt them too, it’s not fine, however, to deny it or obfuscate it for nominal leftist publication, it’s like taking mussolini at his words about smashing the capitalist state, supreme unseriousness







  • Mm, the way i see it, it’s kinda vulnerable to malicious actors (people spamming groups or items, for example) maybe make it invite only for a time?. Where the data is stored?

    admins being main heads for no reason is the point, I guess, than some quasi democratic kick out, where group growth is controlled by the group themselves. Friend group doesn’t operate in head honcho way, why should mutual aid group be centralized (by admin). Now, I couldn’t give you exact structure how to do it nicely with backend logic without some hidden scores or group votes, probably some horizontalists has a developed idea thonk if i were to sketch it out, have two scores of responsible user: loaned or returned items as verified by two parties (loaner and taker), and general one person one vote thingy,and than do either responsible users think that behavior is bad (>50%) or big majority think that user is a dick (>60-70 with some weight to active users, to prevent registration and group dissolution by outside trolls). that all implies exposure to outside internet though, invite only kinda dodges this.