• 15 Posts
  • 129 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2025

help-circle


  • That simplifies things, because it gives you some room to “force” certain pairs. You could for example shoehorn the short vowels qualities into cardinal /i e æ/ vs. /u o ɒ/, or a similar system, so the opposition becomes apparent.

    Yeah that’s the kinda thing I was thinking of re: vowels. I don’t know exactly what I want from the vowels, but it’s something like that.

    Which English dialect or standard are you using as a basis?

    Well, it’s a goofy baby-talk cipher, so I’m inclined to be pretty flexible with this.

    You could do it based on the furthest in the mouth, then you’d get binary vs. velar… and the alveolars are left unchanged.

    I thought of that… I just think it would get too messy if I tried to be precise with this method. Maybe I just need another method.


  • You seem to get what I’m saying about the vowels… except for another detail I didn’t mention. I was thinking of altering the vowels to sound like baby-talk, sort of. An example that doesn’t fit the specifics but illustrates my point would be the word “hello” sounding something like /i’lø:/. But more oppositional or at least more creative in which phoneme replaces which.

    As for consonants, I mean which consonant phoneme would be furtherst from /m/, or /r/, or whatever. Like, the opposite of bilabial, maybe.
















  • Heh. I played this at a Christmas street party years ago, and I had a gaggle of bitter old women march towards me, intent on causing trouble. They told me the song’s satanic because “imagine no religion” is exactly the same thing as “imagine no God/spiritual presence”. I replied that the song is actually about the kind of religion that turns people nasty, like them. I turned around to get support from my band, only to see them half a mile down the road. Very memorable Christmas street party, that one.