• 670 Posts
  • 7.33K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月2日

help-circle



  • Come work on IT projects in government. There’s a contractor stand-down period for like 3 weeks over Christmas so even if you work there’s almost no one around (yes the government said they would cut down on use of contractors, they said a lot of things).




  • In New Zealand if you have an office job there’s a decent chance you’re not even allowed to work for at least a week, often two, sometimes three over the Christmas/New Year period.

    The days between Christmas and 2 January are not even considered working days when calculating working days in contracts.



  • You linked with a time stamp at the end lol, the video started played from the end.

    Can I argue (perhaps as devil’s advocate) that a popularity contest isn’t the problem?

    The Prime Minister’s job isn’t (or perhaps shouldn’t be) to make hard decisions (unlike perhaps the US president), it’s to lead their party and the country. Their job is to show up to meetings with the heads of other countries and make us sound good and look good on the world stage. Exactly the kind of person they are saying makes a bad leader. The prime minister has a cabinet and access to experts for making decisions as a government.

    Plato’s idea of having a group of scholars lead the country is dumb. Sooner or later that will become a form of dictatorship, and in all likelihood that group will get dumber over time.

    Perhaps the problem is there’s no requirement to have expert advice on decisions, or perhaps the lack of transparency in that advice (though there are obviously reasons some things may need to be kept secret). Perhaps we need to require qualifications and experience for certain advisors to the government, some sort of requirements for evidence supporting the advice, and some level of scrutiny over the advice and whether the government followed it. A government that never follows advice must surely (🥺) lose popularity, and a government that follows expert advice over half the time must surely perform better than existing governments…






  • The blog article you link I think implies you do not have your own VM. LLMs are stateless, the previous conversation is fed in as part of the prompt.

    You send your message, which is E2E encrypted. The LLM runs in an environment where it can decrypt your message and run in through the LLM, then send a response to you. Then it gets the next user’s message and replies to them.

    The key part is that the LLM is running inside an encrypted environment not accessible to the host system, so no one can watch as it decrypts your message.

    That’s what I get from reading your links.



  • I like to do this too. I really want to fix it today but often I find if I come back tomorrow I’ll have more success. And I wouldn’t miss dinner with the family to do it.

    Unless it was a server that others rely on (of which I have two currently), where I would do my best to get it back up and running, if there is no real impact to not doing it now then it can wait.


  • The agent is not going to go out of their way to find issues, so they probably didn’t know. The owners are supposed to declare it, though, the agent would have asked about any known things.

    If the owners didn’t do rhe change they might not have even known it wasn’t consented. We tend to overestimate people’s knowledge in such things but for most people they only learn about issues when they come up against it for some reason (insurance, selling, etc).