For me it’s saying, “we can’t joke about anything anymore”. Sirens go off immediately 🚨

  • frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Actually, we’re a constitutional republic…” & “Our thoughts and prayers…” are both candidates, I could come up with way more.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Silent Majority”

    It’s always their go-to when pressed on when they’re called out.

    They can’t grasp the idea that their beliefs are really that unpopular so they cling to an idea of a “silent majority” that agrees with them but is either too censored or too bullied to speak up for what they think is the truth.

    Sorry buddy, there is no such thing as a “silent majority” quietly agreeing with you but afraid to speak up, you and your illiterate buddies are just assholes and your opinions are shit.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    “There are not a lot of people like us out there nowadays.”

    This is a common MAGA comfort/greeting line they use when they meet new people.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “Female” instead of woman or girl.

    Edit: as in, where “woman” or “girl” would be grammatically correct. e.g. “a lot of females work at that company” vs “a lot of women work at that company” or “that company has a lot of female employees”

    • tuckerm@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s so weird how they flip both of those words around. Like, they’ll say “females” instead of women, but then, they’ll say “a woman doctor.”

        • Quokka@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s such an American take.

          Here in Australia female doctor makes grammatical sense, and woman doctor sounds ridiculous. Woman doctor would have the same assumption as it also has an opposite in man doctor, which sounds equally as ridiculous unlike male doctor.

          Now you could say my doctor is a woman and that makes perfect sense whereas my doctor is a female is ferengi.

          • lad
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Woman doctor and nan doctor are just gynecologist and andrologist

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I hope that you can extend some grace to people born in different eras. When I hear something like “woman employee,” I hear my Greatest Generation grandparents, and believe me, neither “woman doctor” or “woman driver,” nor any similar construction was complimentary.

      I think it was the Boomers who started to use “female” as an adjective, because it sounded clinical, descriptive, and non-judgemental. So “female employee” sounds much better to my ear. (But, FWIW, the use of “female” as a noun is total cringe.)

      Yeah, inceldom has coopted the word, and now I hear that “woman doctor” is preferred, but it’s not always easy to remember that on the fly when you grew up with the opposite connotation.

      • lmmarsano@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah, inceldom has coopted the word

        Only if we let them, and anyone who does is an incompetent advocate choosing to let sexists decide the meaning of words for everyone else when everyone else has at least as much power to do otherwise. It’s complacent cooperation with the enemy that purports ethical superiority while being the opposite.

        Older activists who understood the pitfalls of establishing their own stigmatization in the language at least had the sense not to cooperate with their enemies. They’d more creatively reappropriate or reclaim words or embrace them as terms of pride. That lesson seems lost here.

      • fireweed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        My comment was more about the use of “female” as a noun, but your comment about which to use as an adjective raises an interesting point, especially because, as you mention, the generation to regularly say things like “woman doctor” in a not-so-great way has mostly died out. I’m not sure where things stand currently on which adjective is preferred; I think it’s mostly contextual at the moment? (Like “I would feel more comfortable being examined by a woman doctor” sounds grammatically a touch clunky but connotatively fine to me, whereas “I can’t believe what that idiot female doctor diagnosed me with” sounds grammatically correct but otherwise awful)

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      This one has bitten me in the ass. Male and female are incredibly common terms in the medical community, but I try to limit my use of female to work only, if at all. On the plus side, I’ve learned I rarely need to use it at work. It literally only matters if we’re doing a deep dive into what’s potentially going on and need to branch out to figure it out

    • cattywampas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Although with the distinction between gender and sex continually becoming more prevalent in the zeitgeist, I find myself using the terms “male” and “female” more often than I used to.

      • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        I might specify more often to clarify, like “All the female medalists/athletes,” but that’s quite different from when you hear someone say “Oh, you know how females can be.” It’s like their vocalization process includes a filter that converts “bitches” to “female” at some point between the first thought and actual speech, because they finally got the memo that not everyone is a misogynist like they are. You can hear the disdain in their voices when they say the word female.

    • embed_me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Non-native speakers in shambles. On the other hand, even males are not safe from us

    • lmmarsano@group.lt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So the authors of these books?

      Or of various feminist book titles featuring the noun?

      Or the vast amount of people who use the noun self-referentially in dating communities (eg, “F4F/M”), classifieds (eg, “need a roommate […] females only”), or natural communication? In conventional language, it’s an acceptable word.

      Maybe you have this wrong, and instead it’s those who in effect (which may defy intent) stigmatize an entire gender by claiming their noun is wrong instead of embracing it as a word of pride.

      This analogy fits language policing self-saboteurs.

      Imagine online activists started condemning usage of the word dutch as a slur. It’s bizarre: there is nothing wrong with the dutch, yet they’re acting as though we should think so & resist that urge? Why are they propagating problematic presuppositions we don’t have about the dutch? Why are they trying to make this official? Are they some special breed of stupid?

      Continuing this analogy, they drag you into fights by claiming you’re a racist for using the word when you’re not actually saying anything offensive about the dutch. You & the rest of society know the word dutch isn’t offensive, yet these activists insist it is by pointing to some fringe online community spewing vitriolic propaganda about dutch inferiority specifically using the word dutch. You repudiate their claim by asking why some fringe group irrelevant to wider society gets to decide the meaning of words, but they condemn your “hurtful” language and say you’re as bad as them or one of them. Don’t be an asshole & use another word like Dutchperson, Netherlander, or Hollander they say: it’s the right thing to do & shows socially conscientious, moral rectitude.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The people who respond to everything with “no one owes you anything” and “pull yourself up by the bootstraps”.

    We all know no one owes us anything, going out of your way to respond like this, actually shows malice.

    EDIT: Thank

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Grown men getting extremely worked up about cartoons or woman in videogames.

      • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        What a Americanocentric thing to say. What do you call centralism outside the US? I’m the middle?

        • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          TBF nobody does the 2 party system quite as 2 party as the Americans. At first I was inclined to agree with you and disagree with OP, but the more I think about Canadian politics the less enlightened centrism I see… Just conservative doofuses who view the world through tik tok.

        • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Centrism as it exists in its colloquial form often ends up referring to a bridge between Republican and Democrat ideas—both American parties. As the other comment said, no one two-party-systems quite like the US.

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    “I’m a patriot!”

    Okay so, 1) I wasn’t questioning your patriotism until you said that. And 2) with zero exceptions, everyone I’ve ever heard say that turned out to be a Christian nationalist.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think “patriot” is one of those titles that should only be given, and that ideally happens to someone who’s done something especially heroic or monumental for their country. I think of myself as patriotic, because I care a lot about my country despite its enormous, gangrenous flaws. I want to help it realize its potential. But to say “I’m a patriot” these days – I agree with you – really only connotes blind nationalism.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      “im apolitical, or dont like to talk about politics” or instantly saying " anti-woke stuff", or when you say your supporting a nazi, they respond with" you have stop reading the news, or saying something to delfect/.