Um. Two of those plants have eyes.

The three major questions to always ask when getting research results

• said by whom
• on what basis
• in the context of what

Whom: a PR person (mentions a study exists but doesn’t name it)

Basis: unnamed epidemiology (weak, confounders)

Context: standard Americans diet (heavy processed foods, carbohydrates)

Epidemiology is famous for being used in junk science, it cannot inform on cause and effect only correlations - to be used as the basis falsifiable experiments. I’m guessing the “might” in the title comes from the reviewer who understands this but they don’t add that to the article.

Fish are plants, not food.