- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
In defense of the ādrunken sailorsā of Steam, many of the games theyāve bought are likely to still be playable for a long time, some were bought in half-yearly sales, and some were part of ābundlesā that were bought for a different game. The 30% also pays for the Content Delivery Network, marketing, a forum and sometimes moderation, and a genuine customer feedback mechanism. Who wouldnāt want to be part of an un-enshittified system? Fanboy? You bet. Iām not saying they can do no wrong, but theyāre doing a lot right.
buying a game for 90% off sure sounds responsible to me lol
Iāve spent ~$1200 and have 227 games to show for it. Plus now works on almost any computer and cloud saves. Steam offers so much gonna be hard to unseat them.
Yup. I bought The Forest for $2 a year ago and Iām sure Iāll play it eventually.
Play in VR if you can, amazing experience
Exactly, every game Iāve ever bought is still accessible.
If gaben decides tomorrow to shut it all down, everything is gone. They might have a lot of good will based on past behavior, but in the end itās still a company and you have zero control over what they do. You donāt actually own any of those games.
Technically, uh no. Many of the games I havenāt loaded onto my PC would no longer be accessible, correct. But I have a copy of Goldberg emulator, in case Valve doesnāt hold up their end of the bargain.
Then technically I am correct? If Valve just shuts down, itās all gone. You might find a workaround for some of the stuff you happen to have downloaded right now, but in general, everything you āboughtā is gone.
Technically it would be the same case for GOG too if that happened, since the average consimer doesnāt back up all the games they pay for.
In the end when it comes to digital most consumers rely on convenience and trust than taking the extra step to back up stuff so they remove the dependency.
Thatās why the actual back up for lot of people is piracy as the final line of defense and archiving.
āTechnically, if your computer breaks and you canāt recover those games after Valve decides to close its doors, those games are gone forever.ā Yeah, and? Is there a storefront that doesnāt apply to? Just how long do you think CDs and floppy disks (and the hardware to access them) last, if you havenāt lost them already? Is it more or less than Valveās lifespan so far?
If steam shutdown it would probably mean PC gaming itself is dead and the industry is in really big trouble.
When I first got a Steam account, my original plan was to buy every game released on it. But now thatās impossible.
Well, not with that attitude!
I wondered which studio would be bold enough to do blatantly insult an entire marketplace of potential customers, but itās just some guy.
Chris Zukowski.
I am a game marketing consultant and strategist. I have helped Games-as-a-Service companies, indie publishers, and small to single-person teams understand their audience and communicate with them in a more personal way.
Funny way to communicate with your clients audience mate, calling us all āa bunch of drunken sailorsāā¦
I specialize in optimizing your marketing for the Steam algorithm
Ah, so youāre part of the reason nothing has a soul any more. Got it.
Bill Hicks evergreen marketing bit is as relevant now as it was in the 80s.
This just sounds like sour grapes whining paid for by Epic games who actually just want that to be them rather than Steam, despite Steam having provided the same service for free, consistently, for multiple decades now. The real offense here is PC Gamer attacking its primary consumer base (try to tell me the majority of PC gamers arenāt Steam users), so you KNOW Epic is paying a shit-ton for this manufactured consent and wish-casting. Counterpoint to this article: having more games that you want to play than you have time for, without breaking the bank, is GOOD actually, and other launch platforms only seek to enshittify YOUR experience for their own gain. Thanks!
Edit: grammar
Will I get around to playing my whole library? God no, but do i want to give this indie Dev my money? God yes!
You best be glad these sailors are drunk and laying about on their hoard. Before Steam, those sailors were pirates. Do not tempt them to set sail again.
Barely bought anything this year because I am still finishing Factorio. 1600 hours on steam and countless more from the non steam version of the game.
The factory must grow. My SA deathworld save is up to around 3000 SPM.
Factorio is a game where Iāll spend so much time and getting pretty far. Then Iāll ārefactorā some parts for efficiency. Then I get like a new science and Iāll be like, I canāt make this work and give up.
Then Iāll start again later thinking Iāll get it right the next time!
Although, if I had my robo flying stuff set up correctly then this wouldnāt be an issue.
I put Factorio down for a bit. I have almost 4,000 hours in Factorio, and almost 3,000 hours in Dyson Sphere Program. Been playing Derail Valley Simulator, Schedule 1, and Vintage Story recently.
Vintage Story is one I have played a lot of, got it a long time ago before they even had seasons or food spoilage.
I do have a lot of games but most of them came from big bundles from Humble Bundle.
Word. Itās not hoarding itās āyeah Iād pay $16 dollars for that one game and Iāll give a couple of others a goā. I didnāt just never get around to Kane and Lynch, I never had any interest in it.
Aww man K+L has one of the most surreal co-op experiences ever put into a video game.
It legit gets one player to think the other has gone completely off the rails.
I mean, where is the lie? Gimme cheap games, Iāll ābuyā all of them!
Itās not cheap
As with almost everything. Cheap is subjective. And not even just as in āI have more money so everything is cheaper for meā but also like āThe value I derive from this thing for my specific use-case makes the cost feel cheap. To me.ā
Didnāt have to call out my 20+yo steam account
So, youāre saying that Steam games are the stuffed animals thatāre culturally acceptable for adults to display openly.
Giving 30% for Steamworks Multiplayer servers and matchmaking, player inventory and trading, modding support w/ workshop, forums, cloud saves: š
Giving 30% because players āspend irresponsiblyā: ā ā ā
No, itās that Valve reinvests their cut into improving the platform. Wild that devs canāt figure that out.
devs arenāt smart people. talented, yes. smart, no.
I worked with many devs making $100-200k a year and could barely afford their apartments because they were so spread thin financially. spending $100+ a day eating 3 meals a day out. āinvestmentā in crypto scams. girlfriends(yes plural). $4k a month rent for apartments that are way too extravagant for someone who spends 80% of their time at the office. driving nice cars with monthly leases in the $2-3k range. living on credit cards.
the only time I saw most of these guys get their shit together was when they got married.
Heās right
Some people have huge backlogs of games they will naver be able to play, some games alone will count for hundreds of hours of playtime.
You canāt manage all them, and that platform encourages overspending
