Yes, this textbook says a(bc)2 works differently from how you say it works
No it doesnβt π€£π€£π€£ I have said the whole time that a(bc)Β²=abΒ²cΒ², which is exactly what this textbook does π a(b+c) is different to a(bc)Β², duuuhhh π
You donβt have an answer for that because youβre a fraud
says person who canβt quote any part saying it works differently to how I said, and in fact quoted a part showing it works exactly how I said π€£π€£π€£
If you want textbooks that also disprove how you pretend a(b+c)n works
been telling you the whole time itβs irrelevent to a(b+c) which has no exponent Mr. False Equivalence π
Yes, thatβs right. a(bc)Β²=abΒ²cΒ². Thatβs got nothing to do with a(b+c)=(ab+ac) π
Stop rubbing yourself off - itβs clearly making you blind π€£π€£π€£
You werenβt talking about a(b+c), you were talking about a(b)2. Which doesnβt work the way you saidβ¦ according to this maths textbook.
Dude, Iβve always been talking about a(b+c) Mr. abysmal reading comprehension π
Nope! Textbooks write abΒ² if they mean (axbΒ²). They never write a(b)Β²
It works exactly the way I said π
This Maths textbook is about a(bc)Β², not a(b+c) π You need remedial reading classes
Yes, this textbook says a(bc)2 works differently from how you say it works.
You donβt have an answer for that because youβre a fraud.
If you want textbooks that also disprove how you pretend a(b+c)n works, hereβs four in a row.
No it doesnβt π€£π€£π€£ I have said the whole time that a(bc)Β²=abΒ²cΒ², which is exactly what this textbook does π a(b+c) is different to a(bc)Β², duuuhhh π
says person who canβt quote any part saying it works differently to how I said, and in fact quoted a part showing it works exactly how I said π€£π€£π€£
been telling you the whole time itβs irrelevent to a(b+c) which has no exponent Mr. False Equivalence π
You explicitly believe 2(8)2 is 22*82.