Yes, this textbook says a(bc)2 works differently from how you say it works

No it doesn’t 🤣🤣🤣 I have said the whole time that a(bc)²=ab²c², which is exactly what this textbook does 🙄 a(b+c) is different to a(bc)², duuuhhh 🙄

You don’t have an answer for that because you’re a fraud

says person who can’t quote any part saying it works differently to how I said, and in fact quoted a part showing it works exactly how I said 🤣🤣🤣

If you want textbooks that also disprove how you pretend a(b+c)n works

been telling you the whole time it’s irrelevent to a(b+c) which has no exponent Mr. False Equivalence 🙄