It’s kind of a pain, especially in certain districts in red and purple states where they make it intentionally hard to vote… but for the vast majority of non-voters, either they just don’t care or they think it won’t make a difference who they vote for.
It’s as much a mind game as a foot game.
Is it meant to be obscure? I only recognized it because some youtubers I watch played it for a couple weeks.
most notably by purchasing a steam deck
Well…
That implies it’d even be available to consumers.
I squeeze blood to different parts of my body, that must be juice too!
You dont really improve it, just added more units. Its about volume, not quality.
Micronesia
The second movie has a pseudo robocop where they put a sociopathic criminal in a brain suit, the first one has the murder robot. I know that at least.
I think it was a vice president, not a CEO, though really at that level they’re all kind of the same.
Edit: upon reflection, I dont think he even shot the guy, the murder robot did.
Edit2EB: upon further reflection I’m probably mistaking it for an earlier scene where the murder bot goes on a rampage, which leads to them making robocop. Clearly I have to rewatch it.
Many years of indoctrination. When Google glass was introduced, it was just ‘a neat idea’. Now it’s a product, and therefore it’s clearly more trustworthy because someone is profiting from it. (/s)
On the internet no one knows youre a dog.
I’d say equating people’s fantasies with real people is the real dehumanizing thing. Rational people are able to separate fantasy and reality… why arent you?
What kind of effect does this have on the environment?
Denis Leary
If that’s what you wanted to know, why didn’t you ask what the specifics were? All you made was an open ended statement that could be interpreted any number of ways, most of which (in modern colloquial conversation, and this particular context) are going to be viewed as a defense of what the commenter was criticizing.
If you want to have an explicit discussion, ask explicit questions, dont just assume some rando on the internet is going to know your intent.
Well you seem to be acting disingenuous yourself by denigrating other professions you dont respect in turn. How is that fair? They’re already paid far less (and probably far less than they’re worth) you think it’s justifiable to say that they’re suddenly tantamount to the “unskilled” labor you feel trades are left under.
You dont elevate yourself by punching down, you just make more room below you.
Are they full, or is there a small subsection that has them and we’re giving them undue attention? I rarely come across such things myself, though that’s obviously anecdotal, I feel that at least means there’s plenty of space that isn’t dominated by what you speak of.
What paralegal shit in your cheerios?
Three skeletons.
Wasn’t this a Mythbusters episode?