@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar Nonilex , to random

My god, this is Getty John Abernathy. He wrote on instagram “I was tackled by agents & surrounded by about 50 . Just for taking photos. I tossed my camera to another Photographer to make sure it wouldn't be confiscated. at the Federal building in .”
Photo by Pierre Lavie.

ALT
Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Follow up on John Abernathy…

He later posted this image of his camera sitting on top of what appears to be a court date notice. The caption is very cryptic, but from the picture I infer his camera survived & he was in fact arrested. No word on whether he had any injuries, though at a minimum I’d expect bruises. An absolutely .

@h4ckernews@mastodon.social avatar h4ckernews Bot , to random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar georgetakei , to random

Christian Nationalism is a pernicious threat.

TheNovemberMan ,
@TheNovemberMan@bookstodon.com avatar

@georgetakei I keep trying to picture this, and I can't imagine an instance where this goes well for anyone. 🙄

@NewsDesk@flipboard.social avatar NewsDesk , (edited ) to random

A federal judge has struck down U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie, saying it “violates the Constitution and is thus null and void.” "No American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: 'The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,'" U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wrote in her opinion, in which she issued a permanent injunction.

https://flip.it/wcTUHi

BohemianPeasant ,
@BohemianPeasant@pnw.zone avatar

@NewsDesk

really threw the book at .

EO against ruled . Summary judgment.

@IzzyZBen@mastodon.social avatar IzzyZBen , to histodons group

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVUwb-yvdBg

Executive Order 6102, issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on April 5, 1933, prohibited the private ownership of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates. This controversial measure was implemented during the Great Depression, ostensibly to alleviate economic hardships and remove constraints on the Federal Reserve's ability to increase the money supply.
histodons@a.gup.pe icon histodons group ?

@w7voa@journa.host avatar w7voa , to random

SCOTUS agrees to consider a case that could lead to allowing public dollars to directly fund religious schools.

MugsysRapSheet ,
@MugsysRapSheet@mastodon.social avatar

@w7voa
If this corrupt votes in support of such a wildly law, The Church of & should be first in line applying for federal funds.

@404mediaco@mastodon.social avatar 404mediaco , to random

New: A surveillance tool government agencies have access to can track everywhere a phone goes without a warrant. Someone with access to the tool tracked a person crossing state lines to go to an abortion clinic, then showed us how it works:

https://www.404media.co/inside-the-u-s-government-bought-tool-that-can-track-phones-at-abortion-clinics/

Beachbum ,
@Beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

@404mediaco This should be illegal. I keep my location services off at all times. Occasionally turned it on for maps and then turn it back off. They better not be tracking me because that’s an invasion of my privacy. We need to take our privacy very seriously because once we start giving it up, we will NEVER get it back. Isn’t there an out there who can fight this infringement?

18+ @iNFoPiG@kolektiva.social avatar iNFoPiG , to random

- -

The Court ruled unhoused people have rights in their homes protected by Article 1, section 7 of Washington’s . The Court explained that “denying Ream and Kitcheon any protected privacy in their homes would be yet one more permission slip to consider them not fully human.”

The Court found the rules underlying the City’s policy were because they covered people and property who were not true obstructions. Absent actual hazards, removal requires notice, offer of alternative locations or shelter, and an opportunity to determine whether personal property was taken and how to get it back.

the also held the City of Seattle’s sweeps policy constituted cruel punishment under Article 1, section 14 of ’s Constitution in some circumstances because the sweeps subject the to and penalties for living on public land when there is no alternative to do so.

https://aclu-wa.org/news/city-seattle%E2%80%99s-sweeps-policy-violates-privacy-rights-and-subjects-unhoused-people-cruel