@Ninguem@lemmy.pt cover

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Ninguem ,
@Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

There have to be several.

Just a thought: have you considered lowering intensity and maybe raising a little bit volume (more reps, more time...)?

Ninguem OP ,
@Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

Precisamente esse ónus, ao ser colocado nas plataformas, implicará que restas implemente mecanismos para verificação... o que quer dizer que vão aproveitar isso da melhor forma (para elas) - não tenho a menor dúvida - vão pedir ao utilizador que prove e recolher o maior número de dados possível.

Outro problema é: quais plataformas conseguirão implementar essa verificação? Os pequenos servidores com mastodon ou este, com lemmy, não, de certeza. Teriam que fechar - fica só a Meta.

Não consigo deixar de achar que é precisamente isso que alguém pretende.

Ninguem OP ,
@Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

Ah! Ok. Nesse caso, sim. Não haveria o problema da perda de privacidade.

Não havia "dark patterns" para ninguém. É isso?

Estou a ver é grande dificuldade em convencer as redes a aceitarem isso...

@kariboka@mastodon.social avatar kariboka , to GNU/Linux Brasil Portuguese

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Já tentou tirar a bateria dele?

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    No próximo vídeo, mostre como pegar num porche e deixar ele igualzinho um fiat uno.

    Ninguem , (edited )
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Compilando você os binários com flags próprias, não corre o risco de quebrar a "reproducible build"? Ou isso não é valorizado no Gentoo?...

    Há algum sistema de comparar os hashes de builds feito por si com os de outros utilizadores?

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    se alguém quiser reproduzir minha build, só usar as mesmas USE flags que eu, a grosso modo

    Mas há algum sistema de comparar os hashes de seus binários com os de outros utilizadores, mesmo que apenas aqueles que usam as mesmas build flags?

    Se eu desconfiar (ou quiser confirmar) a autenticidade dum binário debian ou redhat, por exemplo, basta descarregar o pacote dum mirror e comparar os hashes.

    Como poderia ser feito num sistema gentoo? Mesmo com as mesmas build flags, não resultam comilações ligeiramente diferentes dependendo do hardware, por exemplo?

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Agora que falei em comparação de hashes, parece-me que seria um serviço interessante, disponibilizar os hashes oficiais num site, com alguma API, utilizável por alguma ferramenta como o tripwire para comparação online.

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Adorei a iniciativa!!!

    Também achei muito boa, a ideia. Precisamos de mais gente como @rita@lemmy.eco.br avatar rita . :-)

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Relacionado com a questão da reprodutibilidade:

    E bugs? Se eu encontrar um bug num utilitário, digamos... que descubro que grep não seleciona uma expressão que deveria, como reporto o bug?

    A minha compilação seria diferente da de outros utilizadores... o bug só ocorre na minha versão (só quando compilado com as opções X, Y e Z... na arquitetura P, na versão Q), ou isso é irrelevante?

    É uma pergunta genuína, não estou tentando depreciar o Gentoo - até tenho bastante respeito por quem tem a coragem, assim como pelo pessoal dos BSDs - mas sempre me deixou desconfortável essa questão.

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Nova questão: Noutras distribuições, quando instalo o gnome, acabo ficando com aplicações que não me interessam instaladas como jogos, ou calculadora ou utras aplicações que vêm por defeito.

    Gostava de ter uma instalação mais enxuta. Apenas com o gnome-shell e as bibliotecas necessárias ao funcionamento do gnome.

    Dá para fazer isso com o Gentoo - escolher não instalar (compilar e instalar) toda essa "tralha"?

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    That's what I was thinking about.

    I have to acknowledge the point @otter@lemmy.ca avatar otter makes about there being a collision with the term "community" in the threadiverse perspective. Maybe "home" or even "tribe" or "people" would be a better fit. But I still do think that "community" encompasses the feeling best, and that collision will be promptly resolved once the user understands what communities really are on that narrower scope.

    That's maybe a compromise we will (have to | want to) make.

    Once again - that's my feeling, but I could be wrong.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    And the term would reinforce the need do stick to that entity rules. I agree.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Thanks for the guide.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    You might be right about being able to do almost anything whatever the instance you choose, as long as you already figured it all out, but having an account at a lemmy server, and two at two different mastodon servers, I do have the feeling that the presence on any of them is a different experience.

    Don't forget that what most people's experience on the fediverse comes probably via mastodon and that they start by getting most of their content via home and local feeds. Federated comes third, i guess.

    I am still struggling to find content on some of my preferred topics...

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    @julesbl@mastodon.me.uk avatar julesbl argues that this has been tried and failed here.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Sorry, I misunderstood you, then. :-)

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    That's another issue I have: Maybe that could be resolved by implementing something similar to (or exactly) openid.

    I feel the software we choose might limits us on the kind of thing we're interested in, that's why I have to have a lemmy account - I wouldn't have a discussion like this one on mastodon, for example - and a mastodon account. Maybe a pixelfed account, a peertube account... what a mess! But that's a subject for another discussion (this discussion was "Permanently Deleted"?!).

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Went ahead and watched it. It's great. Thanks.

    It's a good analogy as well. Others have suggested "home" - it's a good alternative.

    Ninguem , (edited )
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar
    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I did try to pay attention to those details and... no change. Except for the arched back... maybe I should look into that a little bit more.

    Thanks

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I'll try the decline bech press. Lets see...

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    What I allways felt we needed was a federated identity system. Then all posts on a platform could just be followed on any other platform.

    Now, [email protected] has to create a separate account on other.site, but [email protected] is already taken, so he has to go with [email protected] and resort to solutions like this one to post to several locations at once.

    What I whould suggest is to just create some kind of federated identity provider so that Joe can just be [email protected] and post on one.site, other.site or whatever.site he wants and have his posts federate magicaly throughout the fediverse.

    Of course, moderation would have to be based more on user accounts than on nodes, I gess...

    Wasn't there something already close to this? "OpenId"?...

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I wouldn't mind having my identity just be a hash (of username@domain and some salt, for example) and have all other fediverse servers use that to authenticate and authorize me but display the username, logo, bio, etc that I had registered on that domain.

    Maybe let me overide some information for context per site or inherit from the original id provider.

    Then I could be known as FatFingersJoe at the guitar players site where I'm learning scales and SenseiJoe at the karate forum for my dojo. :-D

    ,,,or maybe I'm just missunderstanding this fediverse thing alltoguether! :-/

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Wasn’t there something already close to this? “OpenId”?...

    Just stumbled upon this: https://wedistribute.org/2025/08/social-web-foundation-is-betting-big-on-client-to-server-api/

    Let's just hope...

    Couldn't IpenId fulfill this need? Do we really need to reinvent the wheel?

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Really?

    Or are the ones who stick to their workouts three times more likely to buy a wearable fitness tracker?

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    All of it. Of course!

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    That's one possibility, yes. My gut feeling goes like this:

    If you've been training without for as long as you can remenber and having or not having such a device has zero effect, you're the adult in the room and this is not about you.

    There's allways the guy who liked the colour. That's not about him either.

    If you bought one to help you keep going, I'm afraid it will help you as long it is a novelty, data is a novelty, your "network" is a novelty... Past that and the efect will vanish like hot water cooling. A trick that might help is to get someone you care about to share your progresses and achievements (the data) like a nice training partner or a family member, or someone with the same desiese as you if that's the unfortunate case.

    If you're really excited about your workouts and bought one to help you even more, I'm afraid you'll realize the novelty efect will wain down as you get to know your mesurements by heart as well or predict them sometimes more acurately than the device. The exceptions are professionals - those don't count here.

    If your trainer made you buy one but he's not looking at the weights yout lift or counting the reps and couldn't care less about the records, but he's counting very closely and keeping track of how much time you're spending in that particular hart rate zone or other seemingly weird mesurements, you're golden. Don't (or do, rather, in the positive way) question the need for such a thing, never leave that guy (or girl), never miss a session.

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    There’s a few on F-Droid.

    Let's just help this guy.

    Here's one I trust: FitNotes

    Like @sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al avatar sabreW4K3 said, there are several.

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Getting back just to say: I read the study and it's probably not what my previous sarcasm was all about.

    But the question remains... like @tomkatt @tomkatt@lemmy.world avatar tomkatt said - it's very difficult to disentangle causality.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    That's my feeling as well, but... really? Randal Schwartz is hoping for me to follow him back?! The guy is a legend, I'm no one (literally - Ninguém means "no one" in portuguese).

    As floo said, I can't see a way for it to be nefarious except if it is some new kind of spam. But Randal wouldn't exactly fit in "new people joining the platform without really understanding exactly how following people and following hashtags on mastodon is different than how it worked on Twitter or Instagram."

    Bah! I'll just leave them there until they get tired of my boring conversations. 😁

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    No, I'm not sure of that. And the idea that it's just a scam is what's bugging me.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I'm afraid you might be right!

    What's your theory?

    My nightmare goes like this:

    • Some form of spam and plain wrongdoing will emerge with the rise of awareness about this fediverse thing.
    • To cut a long story short: then some form of control will have to be put in place - like spam filters, blacklists, server whitelists and the like - and the hole thing goes the way of the email and the usenet, making it almost impossible to keep a server as an independent hobbyist.
    • Some cleaver provider will offer a free $ervice and enforces the control techniques mentioned above reinforcing its use and closing the circle.

    My hope:

    • This thing will "never fly" and consequently only really committed and interesting people will linger. Great!
    • A second best hypothesis is becoming the second best forever - the best place to be, like linux.
    • The fediverse community gets really large and popular and has so many servers and services that it becomes impossible to capture by a single giant player.
    • People will "see it coming" and vote intelligently with their feet refusing the big players and choosing freedom instead. Hahahaha!...
    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I try to minimize as much as possible what I have to install... I'm sure fail2ban would do what I want, but then I wouldn't have learned anything.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    O saw that post fly by in the distance some time ago (it's from Fri, 22 November 2024), but only skimmed through it because it was to long for that moment. It still is, so I've added it to my "read it later when you dare" app.

    On one hand, maybe Christine Lemmer-Webber agrees with me in the sense that ATProto might end up being somewhat decentralized. The DID problem could perhaps be circumvented. On the other hand, here's a quote from the text that I did like:

    When you build architecture that in theory anyone can participate in, but the barrier to entry is so high so that only those with the highest number of resources can participate, then you've still built a walled garden. -- Morgan Lemmer-Webber, (summarizing things succinctly in our household over breakfast)

    The quote might argue against my assumption that just having the possibility of owning a (fediverse) server might entice enough people to participate in the ecosystem... just like email, I guess.

    Again: didn't read the full article. Only tldred it and presumed the rest.

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Didn't know that.

    It will maybe come with time like @azdle@news.idlestate.org avatar azdle said...

    Ninguem OP ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    NOSTR clients?

    Hum!...

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    I can think of lots of other use cases:

    • Do asymmetric pull ups (as long as you compensate by doing the reverse next time)
    • Try to do it with one hand (or with the help of the other arm grabbing your wrist)
    • Jump from one grip to another
    • Sit on top of it to have a better view of the gym
    • Hang your coat or your hat
    • Fix that to the back of a box with a weal and you have a nice wheelbarrow

    Seriously: yes, there are differences.
    The reason it is easier to do with your palms facing your face is because you have a better help from your biceps, I think. So you're exercising less your lats.
    But there is no "form worst to better" - want to train your lats, use supinated grip, not enough strength yet? Do negative, do some with a pronated grip...

    Ninguem ,
    @Ninguem@lemmy.pt avatar

    Why is the curved handle hanging from the fixations? Where it on top and there wouldn't be the risk of falling due to the screw failing. Right?