โDongles per snongleโ sounds like a British person measuring the gender ratio at their local pub
Americans merely adopted the nonsensical measurements. The Brits were born to them.
Reminds me of an app I downloaded the other day to help plan routes. They asked for my cars โKPLโ.
Like what? Who in the world says KPL? Itโs l/100KM.
While Iโm aware that some places may use KPL, it just seems very American to go โhey, we use MPG, so they must use KPLโ.
I grew up with km/L.
I donโt mind using whatever scale, but itโs somewhat better for comparing the numbers that cars actually use, because with l/100km every car is five something or six something.
Also the higher numbers are better like everything else on the car comparison cards.
Yeah maybe itโs just being an American but mpg makes sense in an intuitive way, so kpl sounds like it would be rightish. Iโd never guess that people would use l/100km, and I use metric somewhat regularly in my personal life
Guess the difference is what you grew up with and therefore intuitively prefer:
-
allegedly american thinking: This baby sucks X gallons. Letโs see how far I can get with it
-
allegedly non-american thanking: I need to drive roughly X 1/2 hundred kilometers, and that will burn that much fuel.
Iโd change the American thinking from that to bigger number goes further for same fuel/how many miles til I refuel.
And the non american to bigger number=bigger fuel consumption
Thatโs fair, though there was a non American agreeing that every other number is bigger is better so itโs nice when all numbers are that way.
That said all this is soon to be irrelevant. Weโll all be using wh/m soon enough
Why not mpwh?
whoops per minute?
-
Fuel consumption makes more math sense, especially when doing mental math comoarisons. Litres per 100km or the newer Gallons per 100miles for USA makes it easier for linear fuel consumption calculations. This quote explains: "The advantage of measuring fuel consumption this way is that it makes comparisons easier as fuel efficiency improves for a specific vehicle. Thatโs because the differences are linear. With miles per gallon, efficiency is graded on a curve. For example, for a 15-mpg car, a 5-mpg improvement is a 33-percent gain. But that same 5-mpg upgrade for a 30-mpg car is only a 17.5-percent improvement to a vehicle that is already using half as much gas. " With litres per 100km a 5 litre increase is 5 litres regardless of starting fuel consumption.
Iโm not even American but this is way less intuitive for everyday use. I donโt need some abstract measure of how efficient my car is being. My fuel tank is measured in liters, when I fill up i pay by the liter, I want to know how far I can go on x liters. Not have to do a bunch of mental math to reverse the equation for my gas tank with 40 liters in it. I have 40l, I can go x*40 km. Mental multiplication is way easier than mental division.
Well the car does the math for you, but it is meant for comparison when purchasing because range relies on fuel tank capacities. where as L per 100 k is a fuel efficiency rating regardless of tank size. But it it makes more sense when you have a fleet of vehicles and are doing logistics and need improvements. if you have X dollars to spend on economy it is a linear equation compared to convoluted deminishing returns on low mpg vehicle. Like the quote mentioned 5mpg improvement on one vehicle is not the same efficiency as mpg on another vehicle.
Right so in that scenario that measurment makes sense but for the average person in their day to day life itโs much less useful. And my car doesnโt have a fancy computer that tells me the efficiency. Or measure in accurate increments how much fuel is in the tank. So if I wanted to know how efficient my engine is, the best way to do it would be start on empty, add a liter of fuel, and see how far I could drive it, which is probably why and how that measurement became commonplace. Because cars have been around alot longer than computers.
Yeah, not diagreeing just explaining
Iโd love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km lol
My best vehicle is 10. My worst is 28. Unless youโre a hybrid, I donโt know of a single vehicle doing 5-6l/100km
Iโve had Opel, Renault, Peugeot, VW, Skoda, Mazda, Suzuki.
None of them were worse than 7 L/100km. Pretty much all modern cars go at 5 L/100km unless you get something with a larger engine.
Never had a hybrid.
Pretty much none of those brands exist in Canada, or are extremely uncommon. Not to mention the cold weather makes our fuel economy even worse.
All these brands exist in northern Europe, they work fine here. My 2007 VW Golf does about 6-7l per 100km. They arenโt unusual numbers really
what? Even my parents 6 Seater family car drank only 8l back in the day, I drive my Opel Astra with about 7 and my brothers little fiat drinks 4,5 if he drives efficiently. You gotts have either s pickup truck or something really old.
What? A pickup uses 15-28 l/100km.
A Silverado uses 15MPG, according to GM themselves. Thatโs like 16l/100km
Yeah pickups and SUVs are gas guzzlers. i get about 5.5L/100km with my Honda Fit
Ya I donโt know why Iโm being down voted for saying what my cars get. Never said anything better didnโt exist, just asked which other cars get less.
I fucking hate Lemmy. I asked a question and Iโm downvoted. Fuck this place. Thereโs no way to have a god damn discussion here.
People probably misread the intended question as denial of lower consumptions cars existing. The interwebs are fickle
Iโd love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km
Could be an inquiry, could be a statement of disbelief. Up to interpretation.
Iโd love to know which cars you drive with 5-6 l/100km lol
The โlolโ at the end makes it read like your accusing the other commenter of lying and that you think this is an impossible to reach fuel consumption.
Additionally, many people donโt like huge pickup trucks and worshippers thereof. You might have slipped into that category in their understanding.
A Polo 3-cylinder runs at around 5.5l/100km mixed city/interstate. 16l is atrocius
Iโve never seen a 3 cylinder vehicle in my life lol.
Remember The Ford Fiesta, or was it the Firefly?? Iforget the name but that was a 3 cylinder.
You propably did but never noticed.
Itโs a 1l 75hp engine, topping out at 175km/h or 108mph. Perfect for a commuter car
Our Honda Fit does about 5.5L/100km if I drive and about 7.5L/100km if my wife drives. I have had it as low as 3.9 But that was purposely watching acceleration and avoiding hills
deleted by creator
PDF >
We live in a society. You canโt just come into a conversation and start using PDF.
They use KPL in Japan at least, but I doubt the app was Japanese lol
Iโd imagine they were giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming everybody uses a metric that allows for 1 conversion to tell how far a tank of fuel will take you.
Dude itโs such an easy conversion between dongles and whatsits, you just donโt get how intuitive it is. There are 42.48 whatsits in a dongle, and 17.49 dongles in a shlorp. Europeans are overreacting so much
โEuropeansโ LOL try the rest od the world
I feel like this is part of the the joke because Americans often focus on Europeans when metric comes up. Iโm Australian, and I have been assumed to be in Europe a number of times by US internet commenters on the topic haha
There was this one redditor a few years ago who thought I was European because I held different values than him (Iโm American). Man am I glad I donโt use Reddit anymore
Pretty sure that makes you a dirty commie
You recognize the monarchy, so itโs close enough.
/s
More importantly they participate in Eurovision so really that says it all. I for one welcome our down under cousins to the continent.
To be fair, Europeans complain the most about it.
I prefer to measure speed in football fields per minute.
As an american, Itโs easier when you convert football fields to watermelons and seconds to no healthcare. One you start thinking in terms of watermelons per crippling medical debt, everything clicks. Youโre welcome.
Is this a joke about black people not being able to afford healthcare or something?
Noโฆ Not at all but what gave you that idea? Besides, everyone here enjoys medical debt or an undiagnosed ailment. Sometimes both if youโre lucky.
Watermelon is why. But, dammit, everyone loves watermelon.
You make dem der figures FPH nโ you got a deal. I donโt wanna be going no 600 yards a minute. I wanna be cruisin at 35000 yard and hour, ya hur?
A mile is about 15 football fields, so if we did switch to using that measurement, we could all be going 1,000 on the freeway.
Ur gotdang right. My Mopar might be a four banger, but with cheezus behind the wheel weโre gonโ near 1700 nโ gettin 500 a gallon.
Hmmm yeahโฆ I know some of those words.
Wait, when did Michael Cera play Chekov?
My preference is yeets per feet
Iโm all for the Scott Pilgrim memes
Not everyone here is stupid.
No Iโm doesnโtโฆ
Modern tech makes a lot of this irrelevant. I can drive from US into Canada, spend 5 seconds going through my cars settings, and have everything displayed in km, even the km I have left in the tank. Itโs like when coders use constants in their program, and only have to remember the constant name while the number it represents can change in a config header or something. The program still runs as normal while silently using the new value.
Itโs not really worth caring about. Not in everyday life. Iโd say differently if you were a scientist or engineer. Metric should be the measurement system of all STEM.
You could do that in old cars too, without even changing anything. A lot of them had a separate ring inside the speedometer showing KPH. But that doesnโt mean the person understands the distance when told that their destination is 47 kilometers away and theyโre accustomed to miles.
america kilometers
Smog per smoglle
