galaxyBETA
skip navigation
explore

browse

top rated most grinded random
top favorited top play count
recently updated fresh new

pick me a game

i'm feeling lucky
·
social

galaxy forums

galaxy discussions game forums help & support forum games
announcements gaming general game development off topic
view all forums

hang out

galaxy chat official discord server
·
extras

our identity

about site statistics help & faq

for developers

why galaxy? iframe api docs oauth docs

galaxy labs

oversight galaxy cluster

legal stuff

site rules terms of service privacy policy cookie policy

contribute

source code issue tracker donate on patreon
log in

log me in

log in forgot password

don't have an account?

sign up

preferences

theme picker site-wide filters

comments for Some Tree with Generators

sort: go back

Lustre December 21, 2025
+37comment score: 37
Honestly, I'm tired of the whole "Figure out the tree puzzle to progress" thing these TMT games do sometimes. It was fun the first time, but after 10 games, it's not fun anymore.
Lucario2012 December 22, 2025
+15comment score: 15
Definitely not for me; I hate both 'do the same thing again but harder' challenges and progression gated behind 'having to figure out which random-seeming upgrade tree nodes to buy' and it seems like those get combined to form the main gameplay loop for this.

developer response: yeah.. it's definitely not for everyone

pirieluca92 December 22, 2025
+9comment score: 9
MORE CONTENT :PENSIVE:
PLWASEEEEEEE I WANT MOREEEEEEE

developer response: okiee

lexisting December 21, 2025
+7comment score: 7
fun little game! though is it normal that

developer response: In the code it requires at least 18 achievements.. and afaik there's some sort of bug that lets you get an extra achievement

toasttaster December 23, 2025
+4comment score: 4
It seems a lot of people are confused about the challenges and can't do them. You can respec your skill during a challenge, you gotta switch them a couple of times to hit all the abilities and then they finish pretty quick.

developer response: ^^^
probably adding more clarification to respec next update

eyerhymes December 23, 2025
+4comment score: 4
You're looking at a screen with nothing available to buy after a few minutes of waiting. You have three challenges you can try. There's no way to discern which one you're meant to attempt next. You've already seen them stall out before, so you know it's probably not a matter of having several paths before you that are all possible. You enter one at random. The only thing available to you is a skill tree. There's no way to discern whether "decrease cost scaling of X" will be more effective than "double the effect of Y" without having access to the actual numbers (not that you would want to reverse engineer all the game's formulas even if there was enough information). The only way to progress in the game is to brute force different skill tree combinations in each of the challenges until one of them works. Maybe you already found the right solution but it was just a time wall and you didn't wait long enough. Should you go back and try again?

Why do people keep designing games like this?

developer response: the main strategy for depression is to and based on what I can tell most people can figure that out if they know how respec works
also

style December 22, 2025
+4comment score: 4
"more please" the commenters say in unison
vantablack oversight December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
neat little game, although it took me a while to get the stratagy behind depression challenges...
noth4re gamedev December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
i like the strategy you need in depression challenges
(also as randim82 said, it's much faster than 2 hours. i beat it in 47m40s)

developer response: thanks
(changed the completion time down again)

TheRealOne December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
Great game, had a lot of fun

developer response: thanks

ikke091 December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
the generator already was one of my favorite layer, a whole tree about it sounds really atracting
ikke091 December 29, 2025
+3comment score: 3
Ive done achievement 72 but it requires a grinding far worse that the plague tree.
Then the requirements for the next achievement just 1 more
But the requirements for that went up by nearly 150 while even with even more grinding its barely possible to get 50 more .
So i totally believe the fact that the last 5 achievements say that that part isn't playtested.
Yayestguy1234_ December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
I like this game a lot

developer response: thanks

randim82 gamedev December 21, 2025
+3comment score: 3
Good game, completed in 57m51s, might wanna change that ‘roughly 2 hour completion’ mark

developer response: that was quick! (my friends took roughly 2 hours
though I did make some pretty significant balancing changes since that)
Edit: changed it to roughly 1 to 2 hours

ikke091 December 23, 2025
+2comment score: 2
the achievement is something i have done on many trees like galaxy.click/play/12, galaxy.click/play/264, galaxy.click/play/180, galaxy.click/play/5 and galaxy.click/play/17 which was by far the hardest to pull off and now im going more overkill here going to 103
evan December 28, 2025
+2comment score: 2
just saying: if you don't like clicking
EnemyLasagna December 21, 2025
+2comment score: 2
OMG OMG OMG NEW GAME BY MY FAVOTITE DEV

developer response: :3

novacandy gamedev December 25, 2025
+2comment score: 2
stuck trying to get skill 20, i can't for the life of me figure out which depression challenge to complete (either baseline III or supersqrt II) or how to spend my skill within those challenges
i might be a dumbass but i need a guide for this

developer response: you can respec in the challenges.
I would recommend doing first

Neutral_flower oversight December 29, 2025
+2comment score: 2
did my deceived me or not that there's skill automation name compact IV twice
MagisterTemporibus December 28, 2025
+2comment score: 2
Add one to the formula for the salt upgrade that multiplies leaf gain based on salt, you get NAANED if you have 0 salt

developer response: fixed