Catt (she/her)

My window manager (Am using awesome rn)

Alright, thank you for sharing, learning something new every day. And seems I have forgotten about biological poisons

Sounds mean, but that is one of the dumbest takes I have heard so far. Dunno if you just wanted to sound cool, but one don’t build up a resistance to poison…

deleted by creator

Nur bidde nicht bei Fleisch, beim Rest ist es in Ordnung

As far as I know, you need to uncheck ‘Delete cookies and site data when LibreWolf is closed’ or add the exceptions you need in ‘about:preferences#privacy’ to stay logged in

Herzlichen Glückwunsch^^

Als jemand, die Amfang September begonnen hat, kann ich sagen dass tolle Zeiten auf dich zukommen

Solution that somehow worked out for me: Moving together with friends :P

deleted by creator

I mean, could have specified that at the start

That one is quite simple. On the sketch, you get

w+x+y+z=360º

Making the substitution with x+y=w+z, you get

w+w+z+z=360º <=> 2(w+z)=360º <=> w+z=180º

Proving AOB is a line, because the sketch provides, that w+z is an angle of AOB.

I am pretty sure, you were not asking for the proof, but I wanted to do it anyways. Does a genuine proof count as an anti meme?

Ah fühle das sehr. Bin genau wegen so ein Mist bei meiner Mutter recloseted. >100km Abstand zu haben hilft da aber, konnte vor kurzem endlich auf eigene Faust mit Hormonen bekommen.

Ich drücke dir auf jeden Fall die Daumen^^

Making a platformer, you are calm. Adding slopes and there is no god anymore, who can help you.

Also, kinda remind now, Hollow Knight has some sloped ceilings, causing some unintended behaviour (looking at you, vengeful spirit pogo)

The op had one job and failed it :(

You can still play the ascii-version :P

Then people should actually ask for consent for using other’s art as training data

Thank you very much for the additional details^^

For anyone interested, there are some image poisoning tools out there to protect (glaze as example) your att or even attack (nightshade as examle) ai models directly

Nope, the text is correct.

not (x or y) <=> (not x) and (not y)
not (x and y) <=> (not x) or (not y)

Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case

feddit.de hat keine aktive Admins mehr, sind also auf diese Instanz gezogen