• inconel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      AFAIK it’s very model specific attacks and won’t work against other models. Their tool preserving art the same to human eye is great offering, and there’s always rigorous watermarking (esp. with strong contrast) as an universally effective option.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Watermarking with strong contrast prevents ai from using the images in training? Since when?

        • inconel@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t selectively prevents learning, instead it hinders overall recognition even to the human eyes to some extent. The examples I know are old, but artists once tried to gauge model’s capability of i2i from sketches (there’s few instances people took artists’ wip and feed it to genAI to “claim the finished piece”). Watermaking, or constant tiling all over the image worked better to worsen genAI’s recognition than regular noise/dither type filter.

      • Dashi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Open source ai’s shouldn’t be training on art that isn’t given to them either, should it? I get lemmy has a hard on for open source. But “open source” doesn’t give people free reign to steal other people’s work. If the art is freely offered I bet these tools wouldn’t be run on them.