Volume 20 · Number 2 · Pages 67–71
Conversations on Four Cybernetic Approaches to Embracing Uncertainty

Claudia Westermann

Free Access
Download the full text in
PDF (223 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

SHARE ON

Abstract

Context: In 2024, we celebrated the 60th-anniversary meeting of the American Society for Cybernetics (ASC. In more than eighty, mostly participatory, sessions, the conference stretched over five days. Under the overarching theme “Living Cybernetics Playing Language,” the conference encouraged participants to reflect on cybernetics in everyday contexts, ranging from academic research to the building of communities. This special issue of Constructivist Foundations contains four target articles that emerged from this conference, and their related discussions. Problem: Sixty years after the foundation of the ASC, defining cybernetics is still a challenge. Diversity, one could say, has haunted cybernetics since its inception. There are many practices that refer to cybernetics in many disciplinary fields and contexts, but do these different practices share anything or do they rely on different aspects of (historical) cybernetic practices? Method: I present the contributions to this special issue as case studies of cybernetic practice and diversity and expose them to the questions mentioned above. Results: Cybernetic practices are as diverse in their methods as the disciplines to which they relate. And yet, as the study of the four target articles and the related commentaries show, these practices all embrace uncertainty. This embrace is the foundation for a particular technicity in which formation and reflexivity become intertwined and co-evolve. In its engagement with contemporary challenges, cybernetic technicity introduces recursive links setting relations across boundaries. Contemporary cybernetic practice, through varied approaches, is a living tradition of enacting open futures. Implications: Cybernetic thinking does not necessarily become detectable through a common vocabulary or set of references, but rather through a particular inherent logic, which links thinking and doing in a recursive co-evolving relationship. Constructivist content: The editorial discusses second-order approaches to cybernetics.

Key words: American Society for Cybernetics, co-evolution, complexity, cybernetics, recursivity, reflexivity, second-order, uncertainty

Citation

Westermann C. (2025) Conversations on four cybernetic approaches to embracing uncertainty. Constructivist Foundations 20(2): 67–71. https://constructivist.info/20/2/067 Copy Citation

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Baron P. (2018) Heterarchical Reflexive Conversational Teaching and Learning as a Vehicle for Ethical Engineering Curriculum Design
Sweeting B. & Hohl M. (2015) Exploring Alternatives to the Traditional Conference Format: Introduction to the Special Issue on Composing Conferences
Sweeting B. (2016) Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice
Müller K. H. & Riegler A. (2016) Mapping the Varieties of Second-Order Cybernetics
Scott B. (2016) Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology

References

Glanville R. (2014) Cybernetics: Thinking through the technology. In: Darrell A. (ed.) Traditions of systems theory: Major figures and contemporary developments. Routledge, London: 45–77. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kline R. (2020) How disunity matters to the history of cybernetics in the human sciences in the United States: 1940–80. History of the Human Sciences 33(1): 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119872111
Maturana H. R. & Verden-Zöller G. (2008) The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Edited by Pille Bunnell. Imprint Academic, Exeter and Charlottesville VA. Reviewed in https://constructivist.info/5/1/068
Maturana H. R. (1980) Biology of cognition. In: Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living: 1–58. Reidel, Dordrecht. Originally published in 1970. http://cepa.info/535
Pickering A. (2015) The next Macy conference: A new interdisciplinary synthesis. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine 34(3): 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2015.2461193
Rosenblith W. (1965) Norbert Wiener: In memoriam November 26, 1894–March 18, 1964. Kybernetik 2 (5): 195–96. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simondon G. (2017) On the mode of existence of technical objects. Translated by C. Malaspina and J. Rogove. Univocal, Minneapolis. French original published in 1958. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Westermann C. (2021) On globes, the earth, and the cybernetics of grace. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research 19(1/2): 29–47. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wiener N. (1936) The role of the observer. Philosophy of Science 3(3): 307–319. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.