Why Language Kills: Semantic Patterns of (Self-)Destruction
Andrey S. Druzhinin & Tzipora Rakedzon
Free Access
Download the full text in
PDF (414 kB)
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Mark Johnson and George Lakoff in their theory of metaphor hypothesized that our experience provides certain linguistically traceable patterns that we “live by.” Back in the 1930s, the founder of general semantics, Alfred Korzybski, expressed the opposite idea: With language we develop harmful semantic patterns that we can die of. Problem: The assumption that language kills and that humans tend to construct their realities in a destructive way by force of linguistic habits may sound radical. We aim to elaborate on ways in which our individual capacity for abstract thought gives rise to harmful semantic patterns of experience. Method: Using the method of conceptual analysis, we compare five contemporary constructivist approaches to language and cognition with Korzybski’s theory of general semantics. Results: Our analysis reveals that embodiment, radical constructivism, biocognitivism, enactivism and bounded rationality implicitly approach the problem of semantic disorders that result from our species-specific cognitive mechanisms of interaction with our experiential world. Drawing on different terminology and using different conceptual angles, followers of these schools of thought emphasize that our semantic adaptation to the surrounding world can be destructive under certain circumstances and lead us to a delusional identification of some source with some target, which can dangerously affect the way we behave towards others and ourselves. Implications: Our analysis of semantic patterns of (self-)destruction across different constructivist approaches elucidates the nature of knowledge and meaning and allows for a better understanding of major social and even political problems, such as the inability to reach compromises and tendency to use violence instead of peaceful dialogue. Constructivist content: We build on such constructivist notions as image schemas, embodied reason, morphism, experiential coherences, experiential domains, coordinations of behavior, enaction and others.
Key words: Fallacy of identity, general semantics, genetic epistemology, image schemas, operational thought, domains of experience, cognitive biases, heuristics
Citation
Druzhinin A. S. & Rakedzon T. (2024) Why language kills: Semantic patterns of (self-)destruction. Constructivist Foundations 19(2): 113–126. https://constructivist.info/19/2/113
Copy Citation
Druzhinin A. S. & Rakedzon T. (2024) Why language kills: Semantic patterns of (self-)destruction. Constructivist Foundations 19(2): 113–126. https://constructivist.info/19/2/113
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Barrouillet P. & Poirier L. (1997) Comparing and transforming: An application of Piaget’s morphisms theory to the development of class inclusion and arithmetic problem solving. Human Development 40: 216–234.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cohen S. (2001) States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Damasio A. (1999) The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace, San Diego CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Derks L. A. C. & Hollander J. (1996) Essenties van NLP: Sleutels tot persoonlijke verandering. Servire, Utrecht.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dewey J. (1987) Arts as experience. Volume 10. In: Boydston J. A. (ed.) The later works: 1925–1953. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dewey J. (1988) Human nature and conduct. Volume 14. In: Boydston J. A. (ed.) The middle works: 1899–1924. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Druzhinin A. S., Fomina T. A. & Polyakov O. G. (2020) Эвфемизмы, дисфемизмы, ортофемизмы и экспериенциальный контекст: холистический взгляд на лингвистическую проблему [Euphemisms, dysphemisms, orthophemisms and experiential context: A holistic view of the linguistic problem]. Language and Culture 50: 23–40.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eglin P. & Hester S. (1999) “You’re all a bunch of feminists”: Categorization and the politics of terror in the Montreal Massacre. Human Studies 22: 253–272.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eglin P. (2002) Members’ gendering work: “Women,” “feminists” and membership categorization analysis. Discourse & Society 13(6): 819–825.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fomina T. A. & Druzhinin A. S. (2023) Контекстуально обусловленное номинативное варьирование на оси эвфемия/дисфемия Context-dependent variation of a naming across the euphemism/dysphemism spectrum]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura 20(1): 137–155.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fomina T. A. (2020) Икс-фемизмы, или о сложности разграничения эвфемизмов и дисфемизмов [X-phemisms, or On the difficulty in distinguishing between euphemisms and dysphemisms]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura 17(1): 122–134.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
González-Rodríguez A. & Seeman M. V. (2020) Two case studies of delusions leading to suicide, a selective review. Psychiatric Quarterly 91(4): 1061–1073.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harsey S. (2017) Perpetrator responses to victim confrontation: DARVO and victim self-blame. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 26(6): 644–663.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
James W. (1925) Talks to teachers on psychology; and to students on some of life’s ideals. Henry Holt, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson C. (1997) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of SEE. In: Hiraga M. K., Sinha C. & Wilcox S. (eds.) Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 155–170.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson M. (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson M. (1999) Embodied reason. In: Weiss G. & Haber H. F. (eds.) Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture. Routledge, New York: 81–102.
https://cepa.info/8091
Johnson M. (2017) Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johnson M. (2023) Flourishing in the flesh. In: Stuhr J. J. (ed.) Philosophy and human flourishing. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 49–68.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Korzybski A. (1939) Five lectures on general semantics. Los Angeles Society for General Semantics, Los Angeles.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Korzybski A. (1950) Manhood of humanity, Second edition. Institute of General Semantics, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Korzybski A. (1951) The role of language in the perceptual process. In: Robert R. B. & Glann V. R. (eds.) Perception: An approach to personality. The Ronald Press Co., New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Korzybski A. (1958) Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of General Semantics, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lerner M. J. (1980) The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Poerksen B. (2004) From being to doing: The origins of the biology of cognition. Translated by W. K. Koeck and A. R. Koeck. Carl-Auer Verlag, Heidelberg. German original published in 2001.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC.
https://cepa.info/597
Maturana H. R. (2008) Time: An imaginary spatial dimension or: Life occurs in the no-time of a continuously changing present. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 15(1): 83–92.
https://cepa.info/3469
Piaget J. (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press, New York. French original published in 1936.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1979) Correspondences and transformations. In: Murray F. B. & Almy M. C. (eds.) The impact of Piagetian theory. University Park Press, Baltimore MD: 17–27.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J., Henriques G. & Ascher E. (1992) Morphisms and categories: Comparing and transforming. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. French original published in 1990.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sacks H. (1995) Lectures on conversation. Volumes I & II. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tversky A. & Kahneman D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.