[#109403] [Ruby master Feature#18951] Object#with to set and restore attributes around a block — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18951 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

23 messages 2022/08/01

[#109423] [Ruby master Misc#18954] DevMeeting-2022-08-18 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18954 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

10 messages 2022/08/04

[#109449] [Ruby master Feature#18959] Handle gracefully nil kwargs eg. **nil — "LevLukomskyi (Lev Lukomskyi)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18959 has been reported by LevLukomskyi (Lev Lukomskyi).

27 messages 2022/08/08

[#109456] [Ruby master Bug#18960] Module#using raises RuntimeError when called at toplevel from wrapped script — "shioyama (Chris Salzberg)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18960 has been reported by shioyama (Chris Salzberg).

15 messages 2022/08/09

[#109550] [Ruby master Feature#18965] Further Thread::Queue improvements — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18965 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

14 messages 2022/08/18

[#109575] [Ruby master Bug#18967] Segmentation fault in stackprof with Ruby 2.7.6 — "RubyBugs (A Nonymous)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18967 has been reported by RubyBugs (A Nonymous).

10 messages 2022/08/19

[#109598] [Ruby master Bug#18970] CRuby adds an invalid header to bin/bundle (and others) which makes it unusable in Bash on Windows — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18970 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

17 messages 2022/08/20

[#109645] [Ruby master Bug#18973] Kernel#sprintf: %c allows codepoints above 127 for 7-bits ASCII encoding — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18973 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

8 messages 2022/08/23

[#109689] [Ruby master Misc#18977] DevMeeting-2022-09-22 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18977 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

16 messages 2022/08/25

[#109707] [Ruby master Feature#18980] Re-reconsider numbered parameters: `it` as a default block parameter — "k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18980 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).

40 messages 2022/08/26

[#109756] [Ruby master Feature#18982] Add an `exception: false` argument for Queue#push, Queue#pop, SizedQueue#push and SizedQueue#pop — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18982 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

11 messages 2022/08/29

[#109773] [Ruby master Misc#18984] Doc for Range#size for Float/Rational does not make sense — "masasakano (Masa Sakano)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18984 has been reported by masasakano (Masa Sakano).

7 messages 2022/08/29

[ruby-core:109600] [Ruby master Feature#18969] Compare only method definitions for Method#== and UnboundMethod#==

From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-08-20 16:21:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #109600
Issue #18969 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).


Same as https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18798 ?


----------------------------------------
Feature #18969: Compare only method definitions for Method#== and UnboundMethod#==
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18969#change-98781

* Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
From https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18751#note-16

During the last dev meeting, @ko1 said Method#== should be "is it the same definition?" and I agree.
In #18751 I did it for zsuper methods (was necessary for compatibility).

But maybe we should do it for all methods.
Currently, Method#== and UnboundMethod#== compare the method definitions, but also (I think, the code is not that clear) on which receiver/class the method was fetched (klass for `klass.instance_method(name)` or `obj` for `obj.method(name)`).
(Maybe it checks the `#owner` too? I'm unsure)
This proposal is to do only the first: compare the method definitions.

So for instance:
```ruby
class A
  def foo
  end
end

class B < A
end

p A.instance_method(:foo) # => #<UnboundMethod: A#foo() method_eq.rb:2>
p A.instance_method(:foo).owner
p B.instance_method(:foo) # => #<UnboundMethod: B(A)#foo() method_eq.rb:2>
p B.instance_method(:foo).owner

p A.instance_method(:foo) == B.instance_method(:foo) # currently false, with proposal true
p A.new.method(:foo) == B.new.method(:foo) # currently false, with proposal true

# Current workaround needed to compare definitions:
m1, m2 = A.instance_method(:foo), B.instance_method(:foo)
p m1.owner.instance_method(m1.name) == m2.owner.instance_method(m2.name) # => true

m1, m2 = A.new.method(:foo), B.new.method(:foo)
p m1.owner.instance_method(m1.name) == m2.owner.instance_method(m2.name) # => true
```

I think this is the main usage of Method#== and UnboundMethod#==, to compare "is it the same method definition?".

OTOH, if we think this is not good for #== we could add `{Method,UnboundMethod}#same_definition?(other)`. `same_definition?` has the slight advantage that it could be true for `Method#same_definition?(UnboundMethod)` and vice versa.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread