Famous poet /1920 - -1

Keith Douglas

Keith Douglas was a British poet of World War II. A soldier who served in the Middle East and in the D-Day landings, his experience of mechanized warfare profoundly shaped his writing. His poems explore themes of violence, love, mortality, and the human condition in the face of conflict.

Characterized by directness and precise imagery, Douglas's poetry avoids romanticizing war. He presents a stark and unsentimental perspective, often employing irony and dark humor. His work eschews the sentimental patriotism common in earlier war poetry, focusing instead on the psychological and emotional impact of combat on the individual.

Douglas's poetry can be situated alongside other war poets like Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen, who similarly challenged the glorification of war. His work also shares affinities with modernist poets like T.S. Eliot and W.H. Auden in its intellectual rigor and exploration of modern anxieties. Though he died young, Douglas's poetry remains strikingly relevant, offering a timeless and unflinching reflection on the human cost of war.

Read more →
My poems (10)Titles list
Keith Douglas   Follow

Simplify Me When I'm Dead

Remember me when I am dead
and simplify me when I'm dead.

As the processes of earth
strip off the colour of the skin:
take the brown hair and blue eye

and leave me simpler than at birth,
when hairless I came howling in
as the moon entered the cold sky.

Of my skeleton perhaps,
so stripped, a learned man will say
"He was of such a type and intelligence," no more.

Thus when in a year collapse
particular memories, you may
deduce, from the long pain I bore

the opinions I held, who was my foe
and what I left, even my appearance
but incidents will be no guide.

Time's wrong-way telescope will show
a minute man ten years hence
and by distance simplified.

Through that lens see if I seem
substance or nothing: of the world
deserving mention or charitable oblivion,

not by momentary spleen
or love into decision hurled,
leisurely arrive at an opinion.

Remember me when I am dead
and simplify me when I'm dead.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Read more →
Analysis (ai): The poem centers on erasure and objectivity after death, rejecting emotional distortion in favor of rational assessment. It questions the accuracy of memory and the value assigned to a person through fragmented recollections.
  • Tone and Diction: The tone is dispassionate, almost clinical, using restrained language that distances the speaker from sentimentality. This contrasts with the emotional weight typically associated with elegies.
  • Structure and Form: The poem employs a loose tercet structure with intermittent couplets and refrains, creating a meditative rhythm. Its form is controlled but not rigid, allowing for philosophical progression.
  • Attitude Toward Memory: It critiques the unreliability of personal memory, suggesting incidents misrepresent a life. The speaker urges simplification through time’s distorting yet clarifying lens.
  • Use of Imagery: Natural processes like decomposition become metaphors for reduction to essence. The moon's entry into the sky frames birth and death as impersonal cosmic events.
  • Engagement with Modernity: Written during the early 20th century’s shift toward realism and existential inquiry, the poem aligns with modern skepticism toward narrative coherence and lasting legacy.
  • Scientific Language: References to "skeleton" and "type" reflect modern preoccupations with classification and anthropology, treating identity as data rather than story.
  • Comparison to Author’s Other Works: Unlike some of the author’s war poems, which depict immediate violence, this piece abstracts death into a conceptual exercise, showing his range beyond battlefield reportage.
  • Lesser-Known Angle: While often read as a request for modest remembrance, the poem also functions as a satire of posthumous reputation—it imagines being reduced to a footnote in someone else’s analysis.
  • Distance from Contemporary Norms: Unlike wartime poetry emphasizing heroism or grief, this work resists glorification, aligning more with modernist detachment than patriotic elegy.
  • Author’s Broader Oeuvre: Among his shorter, quieter poems, this stands out for its philosophical restraint, diverging from the graphic precision of his combat descriptions.
  • Temporal Perspective: The “wrong-way telescope” metaphor inverts time’s magnification, suggesting the future diminishes rather than clarifies, a reversal of nostalgic idealization.
  • Call for Judgment: The speaker invites delayed, impartial evaluation, contrasting with the immediate emotional reactions common in elegiac tradition.
  • Final Refrain: Repeating the opening lines reinforces the desire for reduction, framing death not as transformation but as subtraction.
  • Place in Modern Poetry: It avoids Romantic continuity, instead embracing fragmentation and impersonality, resonating with modern concerns about identity dissolution.
  • Legacy and Relevance: The poem prefigures contemporary discussions about digital afterlives and how time filters personal significance through minimal traces.
    •  (hide)
    Read more →
    8
      Keith Douglas   Follow

      Vergissmeinnicht (Forget-me-not)

      Three weeks gone and the combatants gone
      returning over the nightmare ground
      we found the place again, and found
      the soldier sprawling in the sun.

      The frowning barrel of his gun
      overshadowing. As we came on
      that day, he hit my tank with one
      like the entry of a demon.

      Look. Here in the gunpit spoil
      the dishonoured picture of his girl
      who has put: Steffi. Vergissmeinnicht.
      in a copybook gothic script.

      We see him almost with content,
      abased, and seeming to have paid
      and mocked at by his own equipment
      that's hard and good when he's decayed.

      But she would weep to see today
      how on his skin the swart flies move;
      the dust upon the paper eye
      and the burst stomach like a cave.

      For here the lover and killer are mingled
      who had one body and one heart.
      And death who had the soldier singled
      has done the lover mortal hurt.
      © by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
      Read more →
      Analysis (ai): Written during World War II, the poem aligns with wartime literature that rejects romanticized heroism, instead focusing on physical decay and psychological dislocation, a shift from earlier war poetry that often emphasized duty or glory.
    • Themes and Imagery: The central image—the "Vergissmeinnicht" inscription—anchors a meditation on love persisting beyond death, contrasting private affection with public violence, a duality less emphasized in Douglas’s earlier, more detached war sketches.
    • Narrative Perspective: The first-person observer maintains emotional distance yet is implicated in the destruction, complicating the traditional role of the war poet as either witness or mourner, a technique consistent with his later works.
    • Tone and Irony: Irony permeates the depiction of the dead soldier: his weapon, once a tool of power, now mocks him in ruin, underscoring the futility common in mid-century war literature but delivered with a colder precision than contemporaries like Alun Lewis.
    • Form and Diction: The irregular stanzas and conversational diction resist lyrical polish, reflecting modernism’s turn toward fragmented expression, though Douglas retains tighter control than some experimental war poets.
    • Engagement with Modern Concerns: The poem interrogates identity under mechanized warfare, where the self fractures into lover and killer—mirroring postwar existential anxieties about agency and selfhood amid industrial-scale violence.
    • Comparison with Author’s Oeuvre: Unlike his more abstract or technically playful poems, this work integrates narrative and symbolism directly, marking a shift toward greater emotional engagement seen in his final manuscripts.
    • Uncommon Interpretation: Rather than reading the girl’s note as a symbol of lost innocence, it can be seen as an invasive presence—a reminder of civilian life that the soldier fails to transcend, making his degradation more intimate.
    • Legacy and Distinction: Among Douglas’s shorter war pieces, this one stands for its merging of personal artifact and battlefield remains, achieving resonance not through sentiment but through precise, almost clinical observation.
      •  (hide)
      Read more →
      5
        Keith Douglas   Follow

        How to Kill

        Under the parabola of a ball,
        a child turning into a man,
        I looked into the air too long.
        The ball fell in my hand, it sang
        in the closed fist: Open Open
        Behold a gift designed to kill.

        Now in my dial of glass appears
        the soldier who is going to die.
        He smiles, and moves about in ways
        his mother knows, habits of his.
        The wires touch his face: I cry
        NOW. Death, like a familiar, hears


        and look, has made a man of dust
        of a man of flesh. This sorcery
        I do. Being damned, I am amused
        to see the centre of love diffused
        and the wave of love travel into vacancy.
        How easy it is to make a ghost.


        The weightless mosquito touches
        her tiny shadow on the stone,
        and with how like, how infinite
        a lightness, man and shadow meet.
        They fuse. A shadow is a man
        when the mosquito death approaches.
        © by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
        Read more →
        Analysis (ai): The poem uses tight stanzas and controlled rhythm, aligning with mid-20th-century tendencies toward clarity amid wartime chaos, differing from the more lyrical or surreal styles typical of the period. Its spare language stands in contrast to Douglas’s earlier, more imagistic war poems, showing a shift toward emotional detachment. Unlike the romanticism seen in some of his contemporaries, the poem favors mechanistic diction and abrupt tonal shifts.
      • Perspective and Voice: The speaker assumes the role of both observer and executioner, blending personal reflection with battlefield mechanics. This dual stance appears elsewhere in the author’s war poetry, though here the internal conflict is more subdued, replaced by a chilling resignation. The tone echoes the fatalism found in other works but lacks their introspective longing.
      • War and Dehumanization: The central metaphor equates catching a ball with triggering death, reducing human life to an automatic response. This reduction reflects industrialized warfare, a theme recurring in the author’s later writing, where soldiers become projections on a dial rather than individuals. The act of killing is rendered routine, undercutting any sense of heroism common in wartime narratives of the era.
      • Technology and Detachment: The “dial of glass” suggests a targeting system, distancing the killer from the killed—this mediation through technology anticipates contemporary concerns about remote warfare. Unlike poems glorifying combat, this one emphasizes the erasure of emotional consequence, aligning with modernist disillusionment but without overt satire.
      • Mortality and Equivalence: The mosquito and the soldier are linked through their shadows, suggesting a collapse of scale between insignificant and human death. This equivalence undermines hierarchies of value, a less-discussed element that critiques not just war but the very framework of sentience in violent systems. Such thematic compression is rare in the author’s otherwise action-focused pieces.
      • Place in the Oeuvre: Among the author’s lesser-known works, this poem stands out for its conceptual precision and avoidance of battlefield spectacle. It lacks the autobiographical immediacy of his better-known lyrics but gains potency through impersonal observation, marking a late evolution in his engagement with war’s moral machinery.
        •  (hide)
        Read more →
        2
          Guestbook (1)

          Famous poets

          (165) Charles Bukowski
          (282) Sylvia Plath
          (201) William Shakespeare
          (119) Pablo Neruda
          (145) Robert Frost
          (383) William Butler Yeats
          (100) Dylan Thomas
          (192) E.e. cummings
          (52) Spike Milligan
          (368) William Wordsworth
          (183) Alfred Lord Tennyson
          (91) Langston Hughes
          (114) W H Auden
          (99) Philip Larkin
          (1057) Emily Dickinson
          (65) Edgar Allan Poe
          (54) T S Eliot
          (243) Rabindranath Tagore
          Loading ...
          Loading...