Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

From: Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:00:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi all,

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Jan 31, 2015 9:08 PM, "Pavel Kouřil" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is zero reason to discuss what has been approved and followed for
> > > years already.
> > >
> > > I will simply post the link to our CS as a reminder and ask everyone to
> > > read it if they never did:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/CODING_STANDARDS
> >
> > Well, the coding standard doesn't mention namespaces. So shouldn't it
> > be updated to include namespaces? If there's an RFC for including
> > something using namespaces, the should be rules for naming namespaces
> > in the coding standard, IMHO.
>
> It sounds pretty obvious but yes it should be mentioned for completeness.


+1

I don't want to see no more methods names like __set_state, create_sid,
function
names like gd*(), and of course strange namespaces.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]


Thread (53 messages)

« previous php.internals (#81543) next »