Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http

From: Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:06:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] pecl_http
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi,

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Matteo Beccati <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 29/01/2015 10:41, Andrey Andreev wrote:
>>
>> It's not about whether we like the FIG's direction or what "PSR"
>> stands for (which doesn't make sense btw) - that is indeed OT.
>>
>> My message was different: the PHP RFC process can't get blocked
>> because of a third-party group, especially if your reasoning for that
>> is to follow "standards" which aren't standards at all.
>>
>> Anyway, hopefully there will be more details on this RFC once voting
>> is restarted so we don't have to have such silly arguments.
>
>
> I'm not sure why you're turning this into a crusade against FIG and PSRs.
> Your argument is valid, but I'm afraid that's the message you conveyed much
> louder than the actual argument itself.
>

My last message was intended to clarify that this is *not* a rant
about the FIG or PSRs, but a concern about proper reasoning in votes.

I didn't want to have another reply because this is all off-topic at
this point, but now you insist that I am in fact having a crusade
against PHP-FIG - I'm not, sorry if that wasn't clear enough. Let's
leave it at that please.

Cheers,
Andrey.


Thread (53 messages)

« previous php.internals (#81369) next »