Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

To be or not to be transgenic

Nature Biotechnology volume 30, pages 825–826 (2012) Cite this article

Save article
View saved research

Subjects

To the Editor:

It is sad and ironic that even though much progress has been made in deciphering the genetic content of food plants and modifying their genomes for the betterment of humankind, many of the principles of modern plant genetics, firmly established decades ago, are now so easily forgotten or ignored. Such is the case with many of the alarmist arguments raised in the News Feature by Emily Waltz1 in the March issue entitled “Tiptoeing around transgenics.” Waltz focuses on the controversy surrounding the regulation of modern (and, in fact, not-so-modern) biotechnological techniques, such as those that alter single base pairs by replacing one nucleotide with another (that is, create single-nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs). We feel it is important to stress that such genetic changes must be viewed in a historical and biological context to understand why calls for new layers of regulation over technologies that introduce SNPs and other changes are unwarranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Waltz, E. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 215–217 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ossowski, S. et al. Science 327, 92–94 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahloowalia, B.S., Maluszynski, M. & Nichterlein, K. Euphytica 135, 187–204 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balyan, H.S., Sreenivasulu, N., Riera-Lizarazu, O., Azhaguvel, R. & Kianian, S.F. in Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 98 (ed. Sparks, D.L.) 357–414 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tajima, F. Genetics 105, 437–460 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Huan, N.V., Sugimoto, H. & Harada, K. Breed. Sci. 55, 441–446 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross-Ibarra, J., Morrell, P.L. & Gaut, B.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8641–8648 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tenaillon, M.I. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9161–9166 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pariza, M.W. & Cook, M. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 56, 332–342 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao, H., Jiang, N., Schaffner, E., Stockinger, E.J. & van der Knaap, E. Science 319, 1527–1530 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez, G.R. et al. Plant Physiol. 156, 275–285 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

    Wayne A Parrott

  2. Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

    Joseph M Jez

  3. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

    L Curtis Hannah

Authors
  1. Wayne A Parrott
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph M Jez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L Curtis Hannah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne A Parrott.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.M.J. declares no conflict of interest. L.C.H. and W.A.P. do public-sector research with genetically engineered crops. W.A.P. serves as a pro bono scientific advisor to the International Life Sciences Institute International Food Biotechnology Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrott, W., Jez, J. & Hannah, L. To be or not to be transgenic. Nat Biotechnol 30, 825–826 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2347

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2347

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research