TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]

  • 10 Posts
  • 2.52K Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2021

help-circle





  • I remember reading an interview where Anno explained that, but with some nuance: he said that Christian imagery was used as something foreign and mysterious to a Japanese audience, but that it was chosen for a purpose within the show. I don’t understand how someone can watch NGE and think anything in that show was left to chance.

    And I feel obligated to say that even if it was chosen for cool factor, literary criticism doesn’t have to concern itself with authorial intent: there’s a reason a Japanese author thought the Kabbalah was fun to include in his introspective giant robot show, and that in itself warrants investigation.

    Thinking that the author’s statements and intention is the last word on the meaning of a work of fiction is in itself a symptom of why many modern nerds can’t read or intuit meaning for shit except at the surface level.





  • I think there’s plenty of reason to be wary about. My experience with psychiatrists is that there’s not a good way to know beforehand if meds are going to work well or give nasty side effects, you just have to try and see.

    That being said, ever since I’m on my current adhd medication and antidepressants i am able to think about the future, and to work on building my own happiness, rather than trying to put out so many fires I couldn’t help to be terrified and paralyzed by everyday life.

    I think it’s fair to demand that psych meds aren’t prescribed like what feels like throwing shit at the wall snd see what sticks, while acknowledging that when the right dosage and medication is found, they make it possible for many of us to actually live rather than just surviving.











  • They want us to engage with “all the tools it offers”

    That just sounds like management overpaid for a piece of software they don’t really understand and want people to spend their day throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks, no matter how difficult it makes simple tasks. If you want to implement a piece of tech in a process, you have to very specifically define which parts of that software will be used and how, otherwise it’s a headache for everyone involved. It’s like giving a set of knives to someone who mostly chops vegetables, and asking them to engage with the knives it offers, even though they have no use for a jamón slicing knife.

    Idk much about Salesforce tbh but what you describe does sound like one of those legacy ways of doing something that has worked the same way for 25 years even though it makes no sense, but it would be a disaster if someone changed it to make sense. Now you just put a chatbot in charge of it, and blame the user for not being able to prompt it right.