[He/Him]

Software developer by day, insomniac by night. Send me pictures of baby bats to make my day.

  • 0 Posts
  • 1.02K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 20th, 2025

help-circle




  • Gmail is simple (albeit not necessarily easy) to replace, it’s just an email service and there are tonnes out there. I’ve heard great things about Tuta, but I use Proton. With hindsight I would’ve chosen Tuta. Proton has put money into developing some BS cryptowallet and has LLM features I don’t care for.

    Adobe is a bit trickier, I admit, at least if you need it in a professional capacity. Some would suggest Affinity, but I won’t. They were bought up by Canva, there’s a bunch of AI bullshit there now, and while it’s free, you should expect enshittification. I’m not putting time and effort into learning a tool that’s going to be yoinked away.

    Adobe is also trickier in the sense that they have a fuckton of products. If you don’t need any of their products in a professional capacity there’s always that alternative.

    For Notion there’s also a lot of alternatives. Logseq, Appflowy, Affine, Obsidian.

    I think the important thing to remember is that when changing a tool you’ll also often need to change your workflow. Some tools have similar workflows, others work completely differently, and some might give you tools you didn’t know you needed. It’s always going to involve a bunch of work though.

    I’m personally in the process of trying to get away from Adobe’s Substance Painter. I was never particularly fond of the application, it’s honestly quite shit, but it’s also decently unique in what it does. Yeah there are tools similar to it but none that match fully.





  • There are usually guidelines and maintainers that are in control of the project althat do control these things. That system has worked pretty alright traditionally, but it’s become more cumbersome now that anyone can generate garbage and basically automate “contributions.”

    It means that real contributions get drowned out in the noise and the maintainers that have the final say in if a PR gets accepted or not get overworked.

    It’s bad for everyone.









  • It’s definitely the latter. These are writing contracts to buy hardware that has yet to be produced for data centres that haven’t been built. All so they can satisfy a demand that doesn’t yet exist for a product no one is going to be willing to pay for.

    It will crash. This whole grift is too expensive to keep going. The naysayers keep forgetting that hardware gets old, it wears out and fails, and gets superseded by newer models. The chip makers are riding high now because the idiotic belief of the market is that this will keep growing as the data centres keep being built and the AI companies will keep buying new hardware.

    It just can’t. This candle is burning fast at both ends.