718·
9 hours agoAnd that score is matched by GPT-5. Humans are running out of “tricky” puzzles to retreat to.
FaceDeer
Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.
- 0 Posts
- 3.44K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: March 3rd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Five years from now, AI will still need humans who understand what it cannot: why a system was built a certain way, what trade-offs were made, where the edge cases live that no training data covers.
Unless, perhaps, AI five years from now understands that too.
All of this current change has happened over fewer years than that. Hard to predict when it will slow back down again.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
52·2 days agoTwo more completely disconnected statements that are presented as if there was something meaningful connecting them, is this intentional irony?
Case in point: the inability to tell the difference between correlation and causation.
I find it amusing that he stuck another 10% on. Does he think he’s “punishing” the Supreme Court somehow by doing that? Complete pudding-brain going on here.
Are you aware that there’s more to the court system than juries? And that those juries, too, operate under a strict set of rules about what they can and can’t rule on?
If you’re not investing anything in anything then this really isn’t your problem.
The companies that continue with human staff where others are replacing theirs, for example. Outsourcers providing those staff.
71·4 days agoOh, certainly. I would never say she was a good pick for the Supreme Court. She’s a monster who has turned on her creator, as so many of them ultimately do.
No, we fight to ensure that the rules are followed. In this case they are, the judge has discretion here.
Would you rather there were “mandatory minimum” laws when it came to this as well?
Whereas I prefer an organized rules-based justice system over anarchy and vigilantism. Because who knows when you or I might end up being in the “disliked” category?
I must admit I’ve been surprised by how independent of Trump Amy Coney Barrett has wound up being. She’s ruled against him a few times now.
Yeah, “AI is getting pretty good” is a very unpopular opinion in these parts. Popularity doesn’t change the results though.