• 0 Posts
  • 678 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • Another scary thing is Palantir who’d be all for the push for verification with them positioning themselves to make money off of it, and wanting to be responsible for collecting data on everyone. They already turned out to be a partner of Discord through Persona.

    They’ve already pushed for government contracts even in Europe. And with how things look like with the US government how much confidence is there in the US government.

    I’m not sure government involvement will lead to the type of outcome people think it will.


  • It’s more I’m skeptical of government intentions these days. And not like the US government venture into the area is going to fill me with confidence.

    When it comes to social media for example I’ve seen more comments and headlines of people saying stuff like it should be banned for younger people, which of course would mean the need for verification. Something companies like Palantir or links to it like Persona see money there is to make from it. And pushing for government contracts not just in the US but in the EU.

    And think of the children has been a go to strategy to try to get people onboard with general push to collect more information.

    Ideally straight up banning loot boxes and classifying it as Casinos would be ideal to kill it off. I’m just worried that it’s going to instead turn into a justification used to require ID collection, since what people see as a solution and the actual goal of governments don’t often align.


  • It isn’t always that simple. It could lead to age verification requirements which might be the goal as opposed to banning loot boxes. Then what has people upset about discord wanting face scans or IDs could end up becoming a legal requirement for online gaming accounts that want to play games rated T and higher.

    And this age verification thing has been getting pushed throughout the world with attempts at chat control in the EU and what’s already happened in the UK.










  • Why wouldn’t I assume someone who is advocating on behalf of infringing upon the independence of another country wouldn’t also argue for the same happening to their own country? Unless you happen to be a hypocrite who only cares if its their country being threatened?

    I guess you don’t care about US interference in Alberta either as long as its peaceful. Peaceful conquest seems to be what you are fine with and will go to many lengths to justify its acceptance. Never mind consent of what the general population actually wants.