The technique of taking random input and putting it in a prompt where you insist it means something is actually pretty good, helps a bit with the problem of LLMs being very uncreative.

For me, while they removed my ability to log in, they also removed all my posts and comments from the site, so there isn’t any need to do that myself.

I’m reading Games: Agency As Art after seeing it referenced in another book. It’s a little dry but all the ideas are explained clearly. A lot of it is just about how much the author likes playing board games with his wife.

Didn’t they already implement this for UK users and maybe Australia? If they already have the software ready to go there probably isn’t much barrier to it happening

One would hope hammer man also does supplementary research

The term ‘vibe coding’ I think was originally about generating and using code without understanding it

Now I’m trying to figure out what dirty joke I accidentally made

which is the point of bestiality laws

If that were true our laws around meat farming would be very different

investigation into the violent rape of a woman in 2016 on a remote cul-de-sac

…

That led them to the home of a state prison guard named John Edward Kurtz.

Don’t tell any prison guards about DuckDuckGo I guess

Nothing like being a kid and realizing that the snow is deep enough to build a network of tunnels, and you are free to spend all day doing that

Banking on investors and advertisers not noticing that it’s all bots until they’ve personally cashed out is my guess

Anyone managed to get around this?

Considering how some people run hundreds of bots it must be possible.

There’s also a commercial logic and interest to that, maintaining the brand of the state as a tourist destination, where unmarred natural beauty is seen as an economic commons, and the lack of billboards being something that people may be indirectly willing to pay for. Pictures of the state that do not feature billboards are themselves advertisements for its local businesses.

You have people who find ads annoying in themselves and would have a positive attitude towards some ban or another, but these people aren’t especially organized or informed about it. It’s only actually getting done when this aligns with economic actors who stand to benefit, and probably inevitable that whatever shape an advertising ban takes will have been crafted with the advancement of some particular business interest in mind.

Whether the porn has good or bad politics won’t actually change whether or not they believe we need to be kept away from children

I don’t know how much it would actually effect it either way but it definitely determines whether whatever narrative and characterization is present implies it. If it’s furry porn it is way less likely to have the typical hentai theme of woman + penis = uncontrollable sexual aggression for instance.

That’s all fair, and I can see how right wing porn memes contribute to that kind of problem. Trans women need more non-pornographic representation and not be automatically treated as fetish objects. Still, I think it’s relevant that this is about something someone was saying about furry porn, which as a whole has pro-LGBT politics.

Why are you assuming the depiction would be dehumanizing? Just how constrained do you want porn artists and their viewers to be? Bigoted and hateful porn exists, but so does porn with a progressive message, and the distinction is not which groups of people have been depicted.

If you want to focus on the word and move the euphemism treadmill along because it’s become associated with offensive stereotypes, that’s understandable, but you’re probably not getting any closer by calling people r*dditors just for saying it. As porn tags go I think ‘futanari’ is overall on its way out, for instance you won’t find it on the tag lists of e621 posts because the word is aliased to other tags and not used directly.

This whole thread is weird to me because being approached in public by people wanting to talk almost never happens. Not that I’m complaining exactly, it’s confusing and concerning when it does, but it’s hard to imagine it as such a normal thing that it has become a commonplace annoyance.

An ebike doesn’t pose nearly the risk to the public as a car does, it’s much closer to being as dangerous as a non-powered bicycle, which is not very. If people fall for the argument that ebikes need plates, plates for normal bikes probably aren’t too far off. I don’t think it’s ever going to be the case that overall public safety is meaningfully worse because cops can’t easily track down rogue cyclists as easily as cars, but it’s easy to imagine cops having a real time map of cyclist locations being a threat to civil liberties.

A better way of doing it could be classifying them as motorcycles if they are built to go very far above the maximum speed possible on your own power, incentivizing most that are sold to be slow enough that the safety considerations are more or less equivalent. That would remove any small decrease in safety without building up more surveillance infrastructure.

Weird way to pitch government mandated identity checks to use the internet. I guess that will really show those billionaires.

What is the concept even, it’s hard to parse the ad-copy speak about what the software they’re pushing does