• 0 Posts
  • 167 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 17th, 2024

help-circle






  • I’m not super sure what “it” refers to, but assuming “it” refers to newly bombing a foreign nation to enact regime change, and not just expanding on or continuing already existing bombing campaigns (which would expand the list to literally every dem president since Eisenhower):

    Obama: Libya

    Clinton: Yugoslavia

    Kennedy: Cuba

    Truman: Korea

    But some of these are quite far in the past, which other users have suggested makes them invalid examples somehow. Idk. Not sure what the other poster was referring to, but I think this may have been it.





  • Look, it’s like the scientific method, right? You start with a theory, and then you gather a bunch of data, and the stuff that agrees with your theory you keep, and the stuff that doesn’t you either dismiss outright, or you rationalize. I feel like I really can’t make my position any more obvious than that.

    I appreciate your patience and your continued efforts to educate folks on this website, but I think you’re barking up the wrong tree here.


  • See now there you’ve made a crucial error. You’re recommending a book which, while it has some criticism of the specifics of how the USSR implemented socialism, on the whole it’s quite positive about the idea of establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat in general. Obviously that disagrees with my preconceived notion that humans are greedy, and that therefore capitalism is good, so I would never read a source that contradicts this, because I would have to dismiss most of it outright. And that’s just a hassle.



  • I think this is a good rule of thumb in general. When statistics agree with my preconceived notions, I consider them trustworthy, and if not, I assume that reality lines up with what I expect. For example, the referendum in held in the Baltics about leaving the USSR ended in favor of leaving, which I think is a good example of a trustworthy statistic. But the subsequent referendum in the remaining members ended in favor of staying in the USSR, and I think that’s a little suspicious, don’t you?


  • Ah thanks, I do have another question actually! So aside from speeding up builds by parallelizing different stages, so that

    FROM alpine AS two
    RUN sleep 5 && touch /a
    FROM alpine AS one
    RUN sleep 5 && touch /b
    FROM alpine AS three
    COPY --from=two /a /a
    COPY --from=one /b /b
    

    takes 5 iso 10 seconds, are there any other ways buildkit speeds up builds?


  • At my previous job, we had a “Devops” team. We even outsourced some ops to a third party in the worst possible way (I’m talking “oh you want to set up an alert for something related to your service? Send us an email and we’ll look into it” and so on). All the pre-devops pain magnified by an order of magnitude. Sometimes devs would do their own ops (I know, big shock!), and they would call it “shadow devops”. Nearly fell off my chair when I first heard it. Kinda glad I’m not with them anymore.