• 0 Posts
  • 210 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 1st, 2023

help-circle





  • Likewise, if a man is kind to a woman he’ll generally be regarded with suspicion, like “what are you trying to get out of this?”

    Maybe it is just me, but I don’t think I’ve been viewed with suspicion because of simply being nice. If you’re sincere and nice, then this typically doesn’t happen. If you’re known as kind of a dick and you switch to being nice, people will take notice. If you’re being seen as love-bombing, you will be seen as suspect. While I agree men should not be typecast as only sex driven, I’m curious how this part of your argument came into it…



  • Are we in a better position to prevent government from doing horrible things? I’m honestly at a loss for what meaningful action the populace should be taking. We’ve been protesting. Largest single-day mass protests in country history during this term.

    We’ve impeached this president (twice) and each time nothing happened because the elected senate blocked removal.

    We do NOT have a strong history of general strikes, we simply don’t know how to do it since it has not been done here.

    Our populace is not well positioned to fix this except hope that the midterms happen and aren’t sufficiently fucked that we sweep democrats back into power and put a check back on the system.


  • Militaries are only as strong as the country’s will to continue to fight. The US had great social upheaval for a relatively low casualty war in Vietnam (<60k dead in 8 yr). Compare the casualty rates from Vietnam with what Russia is experiencing in Ukraine (180-480k deaths in 3 yr).

    I remember listening to Dan Carlin talk about how wars are typically won by the side that doesn’t know when to give up. Early Rome was this way. 1941 USSR was this way. 2026 USA is NOT going to win a drawn out, existential war. We would kill a lot of people, sure, thanks to all the weapons and guns but we don’t think we have what it takes to win a major power war anymore.




  • I have the feeling that this is where we are (and have been) regarding politics and national borders with the current population levels. Local politics has slowly, over the course of centuries, been losing to national/federal politics. I feel like democracy works best when it’s in the sweet spot for not being too big (where good ideas are easily drown out) and not being too small (not being able to effectualize good ideas on a scale that matters).

    I sometimes think the world would be better served if we went back to a nation-state size that promoted regional powers instead of global superpowers. I don’t know it would necessarily always be better because eras of recent history where there is no clear dominant regional power, you tend to get more wars. :/


  • I wasn’t talking about AI slop. With “slop,” I meant mindless games that don’t take any position on anything.

    IMHO, the best games are ones that make you feel something or question something critically. You can have games that make a political statement and are fun to play. Helldivers, GTA, BioShock, Disco Elysium, etc. If you’re uncomfortable with the point that a game is making, then that’s on you (and is the point of OPs comic).

    There are certainly plenty of games that take no political stance on anything that I’m sure you can numb your mind with. Just play something else if you are feeling too judged.