Vodka meets Ketamin

First they come for the …

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and Threads, began closing teen accounts from 4 December. It said anyone mistakenly kicked off could use government ID or provide a video selfie to prove their age.

Snapchat has said users can use bank accounts, photo ID or selfies for verification.

In other words, Australia just enforced “internet by passort”, right? Very useful if the goal is build a surveillance state. Besides the fact that is required from platforms to store these IDs and in case of any data breach hakers will get not only email addresses, but emails + id.

Also looks as a very cool feature for platforms themselves: match of users data between different systems becomes much easier: no more expensive and complex digital fingerprinting, just direct match by ID.

and not the positive sense of the word

I cannot agree. Tolstoy started his writing from the breaking the myth about the “good patriotism”.

It is generally said that the real, good patriotism consists in desiring for one’s own people or State such real benefits as do not infringe the well-being of other nations.

Talking, recently, to an Englishman about the present war, I said to him that the real cause of the war was not avarice, as is generally said, but patriotism, as is evident from the temper of the whole English society. The Englishman did not agree with me, and said that even were the case so, it resulted from the fact that the patriotism at present inspiring Englishmen is a bad patriotism; but that good patriotism, such as he was imbued with, consists in Englishmen, his compatriots, acting well.

“Then do you wish only Englishmen to act well?” I asked.

“I wish all men to do so,” said he; indicating clearly by that reply the characteristic of true benefits,—whether moral, scientific, or even material and practical,—which is that they spread out to all men; and therefore to wish such benefits to anyone, not only is not patriotic, but is the reverse of patriotic.

Even in the definition of the “positive patriotism” you were mentioned there is a paradox.

Love of one’s country; devotion to the welfare of one’s compatriots; passion which inspires one to serve one’s country.

If one wishes the welfare of one’s country, the welfare of one’s compatriots… Does they wish the welfare of only one’s compatriots? If yes, it is a wish of superiority of one’s country, the superiority of one’s compatriots over other people. If not, it is not patriotism just by the definition.

There is nothing bad to wish the welfare of people living around you, your neighbors. But it is solidarity, not patriotism. Patriotism is tightly coupled to the concept of the national state (because all the modern states are actually a national states). While Tolstoy did not mention the word nationalism, he mentioned the concept of nations and national states. And he criticized the whole concept.

I would again agreed with Leo, that the concept of nations and national states might look modern in the time of French Revolution (and there were no “nations” before no matter what the today’s patriots will try to sell you), but even in the time of his writing the concept was already totally outdated, I’m not even saying about today. And I do not understand how are you going to distinguish the concept of national states and patriotism while all the states are national state. Why not just to use the word “solidarity” instead and leave the “patriotism” in the past era of world wars?

I would agree with Leo Tolstoy that patriotism is just bad. And I do not understand why should we invent a “good patriotism” while the term itself is so bad.

To destroy governmental violence only one thing is needed: it is that people should understand that the feeling of patriotism, which alone supports that instrument of violence, is a rude, harmful, disgraceful, and bad feeling, and above all—is immoral. It is a rude feeling, because it is one natural only to people standing on the lowest level of morality, and expecting from other nations those outrages which they themselves are ready to inflict on others; it is a harmful feeling, because it disturbs advantageous and joyous peaceful relations with other peoples, and above all it produces that governmental organisation under which power may fall, and does fall, into the hands of the worst men; it is a disgraceful feeling, because it turns man not merely into a slave, but into a fighting cock, a bull, or a gladiator, who wastes his strength and his life for objects which are not his own but his governments’; and it is an immoral feeling, because, instead of confessing oneself a son of God, as Christianity teaches us, or even a free man guided by his own reason, each man under the influence of patriotism confesses himself the son of his fatherland and the slave of his government, and commits actions contrary to his reason and his conscience.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/leo-tolstoy-patriotism-and-government

Yes… Or even some overview of possible methods. Even a top level one would be nice, because there are a lot of possible options with gear and software.

It is very cool but … very “professional” I would say . I mean just the gear… It is quite an expensive if not say more. Maybe you can add a couple of words about more “entry-level” setup. For example I’m still on relatively chip Plustek 8100 + one old version of VueScan I bought five years ago.

Pter Thiel is gay, isn’t it? Does it mean, that Epstein sold not only young girls, but boys too?

I know that I’m working on a “dark side”… But ad-tech are offering really interesting tasks about building very complex infrastructure besides they are paying well.

There are petabytes of collected data (even in a relatively small ad-tech companies I had a chance to work on; on a facebook/google scale it is much more). Someone should write all the cleaning, processing, de-duplication and matching (aka fingerprinting) steps as well as make this data usable by AI / Machine Learning guys, who will make models that predicts what ad to show to each user based on the available data. I’m working on processing, cleaning, matching and preparing of these data.

If the ICE agent would be not white, I’m sure cop would just shot him without questions.

Ah, that were far-right who forced BBC to introduce censorship on Palestine and pro-genocide politics. Yes, of course.

By working as a data engineer in ad-tech companies and seeing how big is actually an amount of information collected about you.

“How will privacy and anonymity be attacked?” […] like so many other “computer hacker” items, as a tool for the “Four Horsemen”: drug-dealers, money-launderers, terrorists, and pedophiles.

There are two types of libertarians. One type wants to remove the government because they believe the government is the main source of oppression and exploitation. The second type wants to remove the government because they think the government blocks them from oppressing and exploiting people.

It seems that the second type is dominant in the USA.

War criminal is also a pedophile. What a surprise.

And what about privacy? Do people still have a right for anonymous payments, or if one needs to buy, for example, big dildo in a sex shop, both bank’s manager and the government should know about it? And besides jokes, do they really want to build a system with a full control of financial operations of citizens? Sounds like a step to the neo-GULAG for me (GULAG is a name of the system of opression camps that exiated in the former USSR). Especially in Albania, that is still quite far away from the top of democracy and freedom ratings.

It looks like the state surveillance fo their citizens everywhere, including social network is from a very rare kind of questions where the position of neo-libertarians meets the position of neo-liberals.