Federation in itself solves the decentralisation problem, but it doesn’t magically solve payments, legal risk, content monetisation or moderation. If you want an OnlyFans‐style creator-platform in the fediverse, you’ll still need to solve the business and regulatory model — and for adult content that barrier is especially steep
- 0 Posts
- 2 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: November 7th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
For a secure, private, and hassle-free video calling experience, there are a few options to consider that prioritize privacy and control, while being user-friendly for your needs. I’ll cover some suggestions based on your preferences (free, secure, privacy-focused, and no mandatory accounts):
Pros:
Jitsi is open-source and can be self-hosted, which gives you complete control over privacy.
No need to sign up or create accounts if you’re using public servers like meet.jit.si. You can simply create a sex cam room and share the link.
You can also set passwords for rooms to limit access.
Strong encryption (optional) and no data collection, especially if self-hosted.
Cons:
If you’re using third-party hosting, you might still be concerned about their privacy practices, so self-hosting is the best option.
Requires some technical setup if you choose to self-host.
Recommendation: Jitsi Meet still seems like a solid option, especially if you’re comfortable with the idea of self-hosting. It gives you the control over who joins and the security features you want.
Pros:
Fully decentralized and peer-to-peer (P2P) — meaning there’s no central server storing your data.
End-to-end encryption by default.
No phone numbers or email sign-up required — totally anonymous.
Cons:
Can be a little tricky for new users and might require a bit of learning to set up.
The app may not have as polished of an interface as mainstream platforms, but it’s designed for privacy first.
Recommendation: If privacy is your top priority and you’re open to using a more niche solution, Tox is a strong candidate.
Pros:
Open-source, secure, and decentralized, with end-to-end encryption available for video calls.
You can create rooms with invites and keep them private to control who joins.
No phone number or email required if you choose a self-hosted instance or use a privacy-respecting server.
Cons:
Somewhat steep learning curve for beginners, as the platform is more focused on messaging and group chat.
Not as “lightweight” as other apps, so it might take a little more time to get used to.
Recommendation: If you’re already using Proton Mail for other aspects of your online life, Element could be a great fit because it’s built around privacy and decentralization.
Pros:
Designed for online education, but can be adapted for private meetings.
Open-source and can be self-hosted for full control.
Video conferencing with features like private rooms, screen sharing, and more.
Cons:
Setting it up requires technical expertise if you’re self-hosting.
Might have more features than you need if you’re just looking for simple video calls.
Recommendation: BigBlueButton could work if you’re looking for a more robust platform that’s still privacy-respecting and can be fully controlled by you.
Pros:
Open-source and end-to-end encrypted.
Allows video calls with strong privacy guarantees.
No data is stored on servers, and the platform is very privacy-conscious.
Cons:
Requires phone number verification.
Not as convenient for group calls as some other platforms.
Recommendation: Signal is excellent if you’re looking for simple, encrypted one-on-one video calls. It doesn’t quite offer the group flexibility of other platforms, but if privacy is your priority, it’s a top choice.
Pros:
Open-source decentralized platform primarily for video sharing, but you can also live stream privately with password protection.
No central server storing your data, and you can choose to self-host or use a community-run instance that respects privacy.
Cons:
Not specifically designed for real-time video calling, but more for video streaming.
Can be more technical to set up, especially for live video.
Recommendation: PeerTube is great for streaming private content, but may not be the best for typical “video call” needs unless you’re okay with some setup and the streaming format.
Pros:
Nextcloud offers a self-hosted solution with secure video calls, and it integrates well with file sharing and group collaboration.
End-to-end encryption.
If you self-host, you control all your data.
Cons:
Setting up a Nextcloud server can be a bit involved if you want full control over privacy.
Recommendation: If you’re already using Nextcloud for cloud storage, adding Nextcloud Talk could be a great option for private video calls.
Final Thoughts:
For simplicity and control, Jitsi Meet (self-hosted) or Tox would be your best bets.
For the most privacy-respecting option without needing to rely on a centralized server, Tox or Signal (for smaller calls) are strong choices.
If you need to scale to groups, Riot/Element or BigBlueButton (self-hosted) could fit the bill, especially if you want more features than just video calls.
Overall, it sounds like you’re looking for a balance between privacy, security, and simplicity, so starting with Jitsi Meet or Tox seems like the way to go. Let me know if you need more specific details about any of these option.