Thanks for the quick response

Also, what about adding this “Essential Lisp” by John Anderson, Brian J. Reiser and Albert T. Corbett

https://openlibrary.org/books/OL21180323M/Essential_LISP

Regarding Portacle, the author claims that it’s unmaintained: https://github.com/LispCookbook/cl-cookbook/issues/587

Code frequency graph: https://github.com/portacle/portacle/graphs/code-frequency

Maybe it might be good to remove it from the sidebar as the very first link under IDEs for CL?

With discussion on the post here: https://clojureverse.org/t/the-lost-arts-of-cljs-frontend/10180

Looking at the results of the last year, it seems that clj/deps.edn only came out on top this year.

Q21: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-QRiy0fSu3bmDK_2FSNMplVJw_3D_3D/

Interesting to see clj/deps.edn overtake lein.

I wonder if people are really switching in such numbers or were clj/deps.edn users just more keen to express their preference in the survey.

In my unscientific opinion, it seems like the majority of open source libs go for clj/deps.edn. Wonder what’s the case for people’s non public work… I say that after working at a place where some devs switched to lein because they just wanted to uberjar & not think/tinker too much.

See this toot & its link to a Reddit comment:

https://indieweb.social/@simongray/110615043873391973