dat_math [they/them]

  • 8 Posts
  • 122 Comments
Joined 5 年前
cake
Cake day: 2021年7月9日

help-circle





  • First, im-vegan and I really want to like this paper, but I find it lacking (at least in commentary and discussion if not for their somewhat dubious assumptions):

    The word “mask” appears exactly 0 times in the manuscript.

    For a study on self-reported behaviors and their link to infection risk, I would think the bare minimum is asking participants at least a few basic questions about their masking behavior. Even if there isn’t a standardized survey they could pull from another work’s methods section, it should be pretty easy to have respondents report how often they mask when in an enclosed space with people who don’t live in their household. Without a reason to discount potential associations between diet and mask-wearing, this seems like a major oversight.

    There’s no effort to rule out socioeconomic variability as a confounding factor.









  • Word. Fun book. I love that it’s "The Canterbury Tales; IN SPACE edition.

    Seriously!

    I wish he’d kept up that conceit in the sequels, it was really original and fun.

    Same, the first two books were incredible and the subsequent two felt like simmons was writing with one hand in a few places and trying to woo some western Buddhist with the whole

    spoiler

    Aenea acausally accessing and communicating through the time crystal comprised of every living and dead consciousness that is for some reason stored like data on a hard drive in the interstices of the universe

    I did love how they tied together Rachel’s story in Rise of Endymion and I wouldn’t mind a prequel novella about the ousters 150 years before the events of Hyperion







  • if they have an issue with white colonizers using synthetic Peyote mescaline, is that not also worth consideration and empathy

    Edited because I think I misunderstood the argument you’re making. Apologies for being a big dummy.

    I can absolutely see why commodifying mescaline or rituals associated with constitutes harmful appropriation of indigenous culture against their expressed desires, but I don’t see why synthesizing (or growing and extracting at home) a substance outside of the context of its traditional use, and using it privately is harmful. Obviously it’s done against the expressed preferences of a culture that has used the chemical for centuries+ but I’m encountering some trouble accepting the notion that a being colonized necessarily prioritizes one people’s spiritual belief over private drug use.

    If this also completely misses the argument you’re making, I apologize.