I agree with you last point, and I really, really want to with the first.
Sometimes science feels more like an art, for chemistry at least. I suppose the counter-point to this is: if you provide sufficient detail to reproduce but your results are still difficult to reproduce reliably by others, then your process wasn’t very robust and should have undergone more development before publishing. Those details may be so minor that you don’t even realize that you overlooked something.
Counterpoint: the scientific method is much simpler than you described.
The rest are details of the above or elitism.
The liberal who doesn’t believe in the concept of critical support.
Alternate PhD
Spoken like a round leaf.
All media is biased despite some of it trying to be objective or parading a facade of objectivity. The nice part about obviously bias articles is that their bias is obvious, you don’t need to read between the lines.
If that means you feel it’s a waste of time to read, then you find out it’s a waste of your time faster and can move on.
Some megacorp called Stellantis as of 2021.
Fucking GOOD! Holy hell, still a terrible story to imagine.
It’s often the same for science, though there are actual experts who occasionally weigh in too.
And the jolly rancher.
That’s assuming they are competent enough to even use a PDF.
Exactly. Just like the “water isn’t wet” argument, it all comes down to semantics such as how you define terms.
Define genocide how they want, they’re still a bunch of ghoulish war criminals.
All of my time is my free time, but sometimes I choose to do things that make life easier. Most mistakes can be fixed, so I don’t worry too much about the things I forget anymore.
Read the manual and if something’s broken, give fixing it a shot even if you end up breaking it more.
When you read the manual, you learn things (often including how to fix them without breaking them more). The more things you know how to fix, the more everything starts to look familiar. This is how those people who seem to be ridiculously good at fixing everything learned to be good.
They never got rid of the first one, now they’ll just grandfather in Israel.
Lol, it’s been “rules for thee, not for me” for quite a long time. In particular, look at the US’s 2002 Hague Invasion Act that basically says they don’t give a fuck what the court says and if they mess with the US or US military, they’ll do anything in their power to stop it, including taking military actions.
Same, part of why I picked an X1 gen 9 over the 10 (if I remember correctly) was that the difference in chip mainly affected battery life with only marginal improvements to performance with the newer chip.
Wikipedia covers war criminals in Canada decently.
Canada made it easier for Nazis to immigrate than for Jewish refugees after WWII due to their anti-communist policies. Since then, the government has largely refused to release information about their immigration policies surrounding former Nazis as well as the list of immigrants found to be former Nazi party members.
The controversy surrounding parliament giving a standing ovation to a former Waffen SS member for his service “fighting the Russians” brought much of this to mainstream discourse. Who was fighting the Russians during WWII? The Nazis. If a country invited a bunch of Nazis to their nation, has a long history of antisemitism that contributed to deaths in the Holocaust, and are still celebrating and protecting Nazi war criminals…I think its fair to call them a Nazi cesspool. If they don’t want to be characterized this way, they should probably take actions to prove they aren’t, such as releasing the names of the known war criminals and extradite them for trial.
You can find plenty of news articles on these topics from a couple years ago.