• 0 Posts
  • 138 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 20th, 2026

help-circle







  • So russia invades poland to “protect” them from the nazi

    No. As made explicit on my previous comment, the Soviets invade Poland to put extra distance between themselves and the Nazis, since there are essentially no natural defensive positions in the Great European Plain. You can read the arguments of Chamberlain and Churchill that I included in my comment.

    I don’t see why you bring up the modern Russian Federation, though, what kind of link are you trying to make?



  • I already provided an extensive comment regarding the widely misconstrued Molotov-Ribbentrop in this comment section, you should check it out.

    Thanks for agreeing with my point: yes, it was the Soviets that took the brunt of the war and did the most to destroy Nazism. Lend lease helped, but the main factor in the destruction of Nazism was the Soviet interwar industrialization push since 1929’s first 5-year plan.


  • Riverside@reddthat.comBanned from communitytoHistory Memes@piefed.socialObviously Britain did the most
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    it suffered from its close association to the many failures of the Soviet Union (such as its foreign policy flip-flops and numerous human right violations)

    By that logic, all modern pro-NATO parties in the EU should have disappeared in the 1950s. You say the USSR has policy flip flops, but have you looked at the USA’s foreign policy? As for human rights violations, I don’t really know what you’re talking about regarding the French Communist Party “natural political decline”. Since Stalin’s death in the 1950s the gulags were closed, famines had disappeared, and the USSR was an overwhelmingly peaceful nation that internationally provided help to emancipatory anti-colonial projects such as those of Cuba or Vietnam, while the US bombed the fuck out of them. Also, did you just say “nah” to the source I brought and simply disregarded it?


  • And what should the alternative be? Because the other only possible alternative was allowing the Nazis full control of those lands. For comparison, the Katyn massacre in Poland likely carried out by the Soviets during occupation consists of figures numbered in the tens of thousands, and Nazi extermination in Poland killed several millions. What’s the desired occupation?


  • Riverside@reddthat.comBanned from communitytoHistory Memes@piefed.socialObviously Britain did the most
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    while raping the inhabitants

    And that’s where we stop arguing. There is no evidence of higher rates of sexual assault by Soviet troops than by any other, and the whole “rapist hordes” stems from Nazi wartime propaganda and has been picked up by racists like you. You stop being able to defend “polish ownership” over majority Lithuanian, Belarusian and Ukrainian territories by ethnicity when confronted with evidence, and resort to racist Nazi propaganda of “rapist hordes”.







  • Riverside@reddthat.comBanned from communitytoHistory Memes@piefed.socialObviously Britain did the most
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    every factory that could be disassembled was systematically sent to Russia

    Then why was GDP per capita higher in Estonia and Czechoslovakia higher than in the USSR? Why did Romania go from having 40% of industrial workers to 20% after the 1990s? What’s your source for this?

    ressources were systematically sent to Russia

    I already proved, with sources, that it was backwards. The net material balances were extractive from the USSR which gave resources like metals, gas and oil at subsidized prices to the COMECON countries. Think about it for just one second: the USSR does not need resources, it’s the largest country in the world, a fossil fuel exporter, and has immense material wealth from the extensive mining complexes in the Urals. Why would the USSR need raw materials from tiny countries in its orbit? But again, if you don’t believe me, you’re free to read about it. This is a history community, not a “let’s make up reality without sources” community. I provided you sources.


  • Riverside@reddthat.comBanned from communitytoHistory Memes@piefed.socialObviously Britain did the most
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For its many mistakes, the USSR didn’t pillage the resources of any country, the only argument you could make in this direction are postwar reparations against Nazi countries such as Hungary. After 1955 especially, the trade policy inside the COMECON was one of the USSR supplying raw goods at subsidized prices in exchange for industrially manufactured goods. This policy is detailed with numbers in Robert C. Allen’s “Farm to Factory” and Albert Szymanski’s “Human Rights in the Soviet Union”. What’s your data source for claiming the Soviet Union pillaged any country?