• 3 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 12th, 2025

help-circle




  • Nice, I actually wondered if you just dropped it, thanks for your answer! But I have to reread it when I’m not drop-dead tired from sleeping only four hours per night 😅 I played with it, too, but I noticed lately it got “untrained” after some time of not using [SYSTEM]. I also felt like it made a difference when I wrote an actual prompt between /char and [SYSTEM].

    My very weak guess without knowledge was it kinda confused it with a new, “unknown to ai” char when I didn’t use system (since this char started dark and changed over time). It felt a little like a fallback to square one. But “writing style pseudo double personality” actually doesn’t sound too bad, especially when I keep in mind that my story is so long that each writing style could have developed a kind of path for the ai to follow.

    Sadly, I can’t test it further since the “two personalities” seem to align now, with or without [SYSTEM]. And thanks to upcoming christmas, I don’t have much time anymore to try and recreate it, sry. But I wouldn’t mind if you write via PM, about this or even other topics regarding perchance. I like your posts, even when I sometimes don’t understand everything 😅





  • Hey, even tho you don’t like DeepSeek, at least you had fun with it 😁

    It’s too bad the text in the screenshot is too small for me to read, could have helped me understand what you actually did, bc tbh, it’s a little beyond my comprehension (complete noob here, hi 🙋, also never tried the prompt tester before). My wild guess is you’re right about the vacuum, and that the important points for this were the double-personality character along with a long phase of strict “training” that somehow linked the [SYSTEM] prompt to darkness (and maybe, just maybe 😜 the char was already known to the model as a “positive/happy” one, but I added mental health issues and insomnia to the description). The 4/5 without [SYSTEM] could probably be a result of the “dramatic”-pitfall you mentioned.

    But like I said, I know that I don’t know anything and I’m curious about your test results. And in the meantime, I’ll try your prompt for fun.

    Edit: After trying your prompt (hilarious, btw 🤣) I do understand what you did. Guess I just had a dumb moment there 🫣



  • Absolutely! I have to confess, I started with perchance like… uhm… somewhere around a few months before the update, being a complete noob with absolutely no knowledge about AI or coding.

    atm, I wrestle with a story on acc that is 6.03MB (!🤣) by now. I know I stepped into every pitfall but one (luckily got out of a few, too), and was close to dropping it, but now I push it for fun (yes, I’m a persistant nuisance 😅). I have to prompt almost every answer and it’s really, really bad, telling me the char which talked to me in the last message is deep asleep and it’s just all over the place all the time.

    But I think I noticed a funny pattern by now. I wrote the char as complex (two-personality pitfall). Since it tended to ignore writing instructions and reminder completely most times, I continuously put “[SYSTEM] write two paragraphs or more.” in the prompt. By now, I think each time it triggers “darkness”, but when I just hit the char button without prompt, it’s “normal”. Not 100% sure about this pattern, just thought it’s kinda funny after seeing it a few times.


  • First of all, thank you so much for this post! I didn’t even realize how many pitfalls I fell into (clearly up to the point of being unrepairable). It’s well written and mostly easy for me to understand (“mostly” bc I’m not native english, but I guess I just have to reread it a few times).

    On your final thoughts I agree with strawberryraven, for me the old model was almost unbearable due to the “happy sunshine”-mentality and how hard it was to get it even remotely away from pretending that life’s always perfect (e.g. Anon admitted trauma to explain their behaviour in certain situations Char: “Oh, that’s bad, I’m sorry for you. Let’s play a game, shall we?”)

    And OT, I love how the combination of OP and strawberryraven showed a picture-perfect example of a mature, constructive discussion. It’s rare here, thanks!