Sure but there is a difference between talking about something you find exciting, and “humblebragging”

It’s legal to have ZERO days off a year?! This feels like a human rights violation somehow

So I enjoy good discourse, and I think most of your post is reasonable, but is it really necessary to start it off with insults and condescension?

Ok interesting, thanks for the answer. I’m also curious what exactly “community” envisions? Does it just refer to existing towns/cities/city divisions? Or would it be necessary for the existing areas to be “broken up” into smaller, closer communities? My thinking is that in large cities there are often a huge number of people, and yet very little sense of community between them, so I am doubtful how well a community driven system could scale?

So, genuine question: under anarchism, what would be the societal response to, say, someone abusing their partner, or a serial killer or something?

So relatable!

I used to agree with you, then I came to Europe where everyone can speak at least two languages. So they must be doing something right in schools here

The entire point is that he was a human. Believing that he wasn’t a human would invalidate basically the entire premise of Christianity.

A bit unscientific. As a control we should additionally launch him into another star to make sure our sun isn’t biased

I think it’s the way the panels are labelled. I think if it read just “Before” and “Now”, or something like that, it would clearly be about personal experience, funny, maybe relatable.

But with “Shopping as a man/woman” it can interpreted as either personal experience of both sides OR broad sweeping generalisations of what men/women must all experience when shopping. And that second version is the boomer rehash.

Dingo Didgeridoo

That would have been a shit ending. But you are right, it would have been much better than we got.

I definitely want mountain water, it’s delicious. 100x better than any bottled water.

I believe the “competition” in the original context is Advent of Code, not the job market. As you can see most of those people already have good jobs, why would they need to compete with the likes of you?

The motive might be to prevent harm, but motive does not justify actions. Parents literally used to beat children, to make them more obedient and thereby “protecting” them. Some parents today will prevent their child being vaccinated from life threatening diseases, because in their culture vaccines are seen as bad, and their warped view of medicine makes them think they are protecting their children.

Motive is not justification.

I think you misplaced your reply

Ski instructor

His stories are good though, and it’s not like reading them is supporting him any more.

Yes it seems so, but only up to people born before Dec 15 2025. Anyone born after require that their Canadian parent had spent at least 3 years in Canada, in order to also be Canadian