You might have noticed that even on Firefox (depending on your lists) YouTube may detect uBlock Origin on Firefox now

There’s already a workaround (found, again, here), but I figured I would use this opportunity to tell people that projects like Piped and Invidious exist, which both allow you to watch YouTube without loading their ads, with improved Privacy and (in the case of Piped) even Geoblocking-Circumvention and SponsorBlock out of the box.

They’re both great tools, and using something like LibRedirect you can even automatically go to Piped or Invidious when clicking/opening a YouTube link (and more).

Both don’t load ads, but unless changed in the settings Individous may still make connections to Google/YouTube to load the video(s) themselves.

Bit of a shameless plug for these projects, but I figured this is a really good time to show these projects as I often see people asking what they are in threads on here

  • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    I’d like to add to the sentiment of this post by saying that if you ever used any of those amazing websites, I’m sure the developers will highly appreciate it if those with the means could consider contributing to their projects.

    We all know how greedy and shameless YouTube can be, and yet those developers give us incredible products for free. And if you ever saw the entitled requests of some users on their projects’ pages whenever YouTube implements some changes, and they have to rush to fix their code, I’m sure you would appreciate them even more. I’ve personally seen quite a few projects being abandoned because of the sometimes thankless job of being a developer, and I would hate it for any of these to suffer a similar fate.

    So if you can and are willing, feel free to join me in contributing to:

    • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      ·
      2 年前

      I was about to say add uBlock Origin to that list but apparently they don’t accept donations per the bottom of their homepage.

      I will not accept donations or sponsorships of any kind.

      That’s some fuck you energy right there.

      • forensic_potato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 年前

        Lmao serious ‘fuck you’ energy.

        Out of curiosity I went to the project’s page and saw more info on why they don’t take donations:

        Free. Open-source. For users by users. No donations sought. If you ever want to contribute something, think about the people working hard to maintain the filter lists you are using, which are available to use by all for free.

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      Its crazy all my piped servers stopped working which sucks, if anyone is willing to share a server that works or a self hosted one they could let me in. Hit me up

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      2 年前

      The irony of these smalltime maintainers asking for donations when their own software is purpose made to hurt the income of smalltime creators. Particularly if they include Sponsorblock.

  • shish_mish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 年前

    I am using Ublock and sponsor block,so far no adverts but it is always good to have more tools,just in case.Thank you for the links :)

    • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 年前

      My HTPC has accounts in chrome on there for each member of the family. All are configured the same with ublock origin but only one is getting the popups.

    • Ender of Games@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 年前

      I stopped using Revanced for NewPipe when it was giving me trouble. But I have a friend that swears by Revanced.

      They are Android only, iirc. Practically the mobile app version of the projects someone listed in another comment.

  • janbug@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 年前

    I’ve found for me, freetube works better than invidious and piped. Much better response time and freetube has subscriptions nd a good UI.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 年前

      I did the same yesterday and was pleasantly surprised with how much more responsive it is compared to normal YouTube in a browser. The interface is very snappy. FreeTube also has Sponsor Block built in as an optional feature.

    • froggers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      I would love to use it, instead of YouTube but two things hold me back.

      1. Sometimes I like to just browse the home page and watch some recommended videos, and Freetube does not have that.
      2. Blocking channels with Freetube is kinda bothersome. Having to copy-paste the name of every channel I don’t want to see is tedious, especially since I use the Blocktube extension, and at this point have hundreds of channels blocked. I would be happy if there was a similar option in Freetube, or if I could import my blocklist from BlockTube.
    • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 年前

      I think the last update made it better. I used to get errors loading pages and feeds… It would still work but it would post an annoying error bubble. Now it doesn’t! This is one of my must haves for a Linus install.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 年前

    I’d also like to point out that mpv has youtube-dl built-in (and can also use the cooler fork, yt-dlp). You can open YouTube links directly in mpv and they will play with no bullshit. It can even pull 4K streams.

    There are browser plugins that let you open links directly in external programs like mpv, although they are a bit of a hassle to set up (especially if you are on Ubuntu with their godforsaken Snaps).

    • Frellwit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Also for anyone wondering how to set the default quality for videos.

      Edit your mpv.confand add ytdl-format=bestvideo[height<=720]+bestaudio/best[height<=720] to play all videos in 720p for example.

      Lemmy can’t display some characters correctly. replace &lt; with a left pointing arrow <

    • zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      and there is also Newpipe! You can import your subscriptions. Only problem is that scam profiles’ comments with NSFW profile pictures are everywhere there, I still don’t know a workaround

  • squid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 年前

    Do away with YouTube and use software like freetube, no adds, sponsorblock, and google can’t track my habbits

    • OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      I’ve started using Freetube since this adblock issue. The only feature I’m waiting for is the ability to open in new tabs. Other than that, it’s an improved YouTube user experience

  • BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    Unless people mass-migrate away from Chrome-based browsers (basically everything expect Firefox) Google will at one point enable their Web Environment Integrity thing, force all other browsers to enable it too because otherwise a lot of websites will stop working in them, and no alternative frontend will have access to the video streams anymore.

    • Sparking@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Perhaps, but eventually there will probably ba a certificate authority alternative to Google. But I agree, we need regulation to determine to ensure that programs calling themselves web browsers will have to adhere to standards, and not be based on features that make certain websites work only on their browser. I think the backlash reaction to implementing “integrity” as a standard was really healthy. But there is still a lot of action to take on the regulatory front.

      • BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        eventually there will probably ba a certificate authority alternative to Google

        Which won’t matter (for access from third-party apps), because to be accepted by websites they need to prove their trustworthiness, so you can’t just use a different one to circumvent it.

        • Sparking@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          It can be very similar to the TLS scheme we use today, where certificates are signed by regulated CA’s. The only difference is that currently there is no regulation to ensure that Google will build chrimium to trust other authorities for browser integrity other than itself. That is definitely a major concern. Fortunately, I don’t think that it is long term viable. First, Microsoft, Mozilla and Apple would be extremely unhappy with this scheme. That’s right off the bat. So there will definitely be resistance on that front because eventually it would do something like break youtube compatibility with Firefox.

          Now, I do think that it is plausible that these organizations could come to a agreement that is still ultimately bad for web browsers. There fore, this should be considered by government regulators as something to pay attention to. I’m not too pessimistic about them doing this. There us political will to preserve the open internet, especially in the EU. It looks like the US is also set to re-adopt net neutrality rules. So, im just not as pessimistic about it.

          The only issue is that in the short-term, alot of these services that are free are going to degrade. This is what we are seeing with youtube. That is too bad, but I am hopeful and optimistic that it will lead to a more open internet. The fact that we are having this conversation on a decentralized social network is a positive sign.

          • BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 年前

            It still doesn’t matter. A website can choose which attestors to trust (if they had to trust all of them the whole thing would be useless), so Youtube can just deny access to the video streams to anything that isn’t a trusted browser environment, and anything third party like Invidious, Piped, Newpipe, Freetube… won’t be able to work anymore.

            • Sparking@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 年前

              Well yeah. But those clients could ultimately just say they are firefox if Mozilla is open enough, which they tend to be. It ends when Google decides that stuff like YouTube should only work on chrome. That would be bad, and I think regulators would treat it as bad, especially the EU.

              Just to be clear, I don’t think forcing this standard down everyone’s throats for naked commercial reasons is a good idea either.

              • BrioxorMorbide@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 年前

                IIRC the proposal includes some crypto-handshake verification to make sure the attestor is who it claims to be, so no, apps can’t just fake it. Or, if some of those secret keys leak and apps use it, sites won’t accept it anymore.

                • Sparking@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 年前

                  It’s a question of trust. Google will select the certificates they trust for the services they provide, and the entities that own those certificates will decide what do to with them. If they trust a certificate from Mozilla, and Mozilla agrees to make that certificate open to everyone for instance, than Google’s only choice is to stop trusting it. But if Mozilla decides that is the certificate Firefox will use, than Google has to choose kicking off Firefox as well as other third party apps. Same with Microsoft and Apple, but I think Mozilla is more likely to oppose this kind of standard rather than try to reach some kind of agreement with Google.

                  The other way that this could play out every browser dev makes some kind of arrangement. Very unstable when we are talking about competitors.

                  At the end of the day, it requires a level of co-operation with the browser developers and internet service providers that I don’t think a lot of people will go for, for various reasons. Especially not regulators. I guess I am just more optimistic about the open internet.

    • Sphere@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      Web environment integrity is a non-starter because it offers avenues for bad actors to enforce “integrity” that forces malware to be loaded as well as legitimate page elements. However, that doesn’t mean Google won’t keep trying to stop ad blockers, alternative interfaces etc in the future.

  • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    I wish PeerTube gained enough traction to be the competition of YT. I hate that Google think they know you better than yourself and uses that broken algorithm to send you thing you don’t want to see. If I tell 5 times I don’t want something a correct algorithm would say “I’m not sending you any more of this” instead of trying other 100 times to make you swallow the videos they want.

    • rush@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Absolutely agreed, I would love for peertube to take off

    • Mio@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Youtube is just the database with video. Just use a different frontend. The problem is if I actually want recommended videos but without Google knowing about it, then it is hard due to the massive amount of videos. Only Google have the money so scan everything.

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        And Google can pull the plug on the database whenever they want, just like Reddit or Twitter did with third party apps.

        • Mio@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          Yes, they can, like any other company or organization can. But they can’t remove the humans producing. That means the humans will just go anywhere else. Youtube is a standalone product that they probalby want to keep as I think it pays for itself with that amount of ads.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 年前

    I was having really bad time with the constant adblocker warning pop-up yesterday so I disabled all other extensions, restored uBlock Origin to the default settings aswell as cleared the catche and updated filter-lists. Then I cleared all Firefox cookies and restarted it. This morning I did not get the warning unlike the few past days, so far so good. I’m sure this isn’t a permanent fix, but for those of you still struggling with it, these are the steps you might want to try.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    No account access, not for me. I’ve curated this account for many years and I really like the feed of videos and creators I get. Until one of them can use my account, I’m going to keep battling the ads.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        I can subscribe, or I can transfer over 15 years of subscription, watch history, saved videos, etc? Because those are very different things and I’m only interested in the ladder.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 年前

          You can definitely transfer subscriptions and saved videos, but I don’t believe there is a way to transfer your watch history. Google allows you to download XML files with details of the former, but not the latter.

          That’s the case with Invidious anyway, I don’t use piped.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 年前

    I’ll stick with revanced, there really isn’t anything they can do to stop it long term.

    • Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      Just a note for people wanting to install it:

      The only official website is www.revanced.app and www.github.com/revanced , all other websites are unoffincial and can sometimes spread malware. Unfortunetley the official site has terrible SEO and shows up very low in search results. Also the revanced team dosen’t distibute prebuilt apks for copyright reasons, you have to patch the stock apk yourself.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 年前

      I can’t comment on how Piped works, but I can tell you how it doesn’t work. Piped does not access or utilize your Google account in any way. 👍

      This comment was posted from a device that’s never been logged into any Google account in the first place.

      • Tanya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 年前

        What email account provider do you use? Would be interested to get free of Google. .

        • SimplePhysics@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 年前

          If you want to get away from just Google, you can try iCloud or whatever Microsoft calls their Mail product now. If you want to get away with big tech run products, I recommend Proton. Of course you can always go full tinfoil hat and host your own email server with your own domain, but that will set you back at least 7 bucks a year, even if you for the cheapest register (Cloudflare, they don’t add their own fees at all, so you can’t really go lower).

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 年前

          Unfortunately I still use Google, just not on this particular phone or my tablet. I’m still in the process of gradually de-Googling myself.

          I’ve heard Proton is good though, it’s on my radar in the future… https://proton.me/

          Also, not for daily use, more as a throwaway email for sites that have no business asking your email… https://www.dispostable.com/

    • rush@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      It doesn’t use the APIs at all, which is also why Google can’t Cease & Desist them for not complying with API terms