Plainly not, if programmers keep doing it differently. It’s still math
So, by your logic, if I’m playing Rugby League, but unlike everyone else on the field I’m playing by the rules of Rugby Union, then according to you I am nevertheless playing Rugby League… or am I nevertheless playing Rugby Union??? 😂😂😂 Sorry dude, Maths has rules, if you disobey the rules then you’re no longer doing Maths. BTW, the programmers think they are obeying the rules, but in fact failed to check they remembered right
For example: you understand there’s different rules for rugby, and they’re both rugby.
And Maths and Physics are both part of Science but have different rules. 🙄 Spoiler alert: Physicists try to match their rules to Maths where possible - e.g. the work on Chaos Theory and Quantum Physics.
If it’s different and it works then it’s not universal
Emphasis on “and it works”. Where people have disobeyed the rules of Maths it most certainly does not work, hence why they’re rules 😂
If a programmer fumbles the symbols for addition and subtraction, their notation says 1-2=4+1, and that’s still following the rules. That equation still reads “one plus two equals four minus one.” You can insist it’s not infix - you cannot insist it’s not math.
A notation where you have to do 4/(3(2+1)) to get 0.44 instead of 4 works just fine. There is no equation it cannot represent. You can insist it’s not infix - you cannot insist it’s not math.
So, by your logic, if I’m playing Rugby League, but unlike everyone else on the field I’m playing by the rules of Rugby Union, then according to you I am nevertheless playing Rugby League… or am I nevertheless playing Rugby Union??? 😂😂😂 Sorry dude, Maths has rules, if you disobey the rules then you’re no longer doing Maths. BTW, the programmers think they are obeying the rules, but in fact failed to check they remembered right
It’s amazing how “by your logic” has never been followed by any relevant sentence, and “this you?” never misses.
For example: you understand there’s different rules for rugby, and they’re both rugby.
If it’s different and it works then it’s not universal.
And Maths and Physics are both part of Science but have different rules. 🙄 Spoiler alert: Physicists try to match their rules to Maths where possible - e.g. the work on Chaos Theory and Quantum Physics.
Emphasis on “and it works”. Where people have disobeyed the rules of Maths it most certainly does not work, hence why they’re rules 😂
Different notations work fine. And if they can be different, they’re not the part that’s universal.
because they all obey the same rules 🙄
That’s right, the rules are universal, as I have been saying all along 🤣🤣🤣
If a programmer fumbles the symbols for addition and subtraction, their notation says 1-2=4+1, and that’s still following the rules. That equation still reads “one plus two equals four minus one.” You can insist it’s not infix - you cannot insist it’s not math.
A notation where you have to do 4/(3(2+1)) to get 0.44 instead of 4 works just fine. There is no equation it cannot represent. You can insist it’s not infix - you cannot insist it’s not math.