• 💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱English
    1·
    10 days ago

    Chain calculators are the subject

    No they’re not…

    And when that was proven wrong the goalposts got moved to chain calculators, because neither of you are man enough to admit you were wrong 🙄

    we are talking about chain calculators

    You have been since you were proven wrong about all basic, non-scientific, non-graphing calculators 🙄

    they’re the ones with only an accumulator

    Which isn’t all basic, non-scientific, non-graphing calculators 🙄

    the topic is calculators where 2+3*4 gets 20

    No. the topic was…

    which was proven wrong

    say the Sinclair Executive could totes mcgoats do (a+b)c+(d+e)f

    It can’t, because no brackets keys, the calculator does have a stack, as per the manual in which (2+3)x4=20 and 2+3x4=14

    Do you understand there are calculators that can’t?

    Do you understand the claim was that none of them can?

    do you actually believe chain calculators are a thing that exists

    It’s right there in the manual! 🤣🤣🤣

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      1·
      10 days ago

      ‘Not all basic non-scientific et cetera!’

      Okay - but some. Yes? Some calculators are chain calculators.

      Are you capable of discussing chain calculators, and comprehending that they have a different notation?

      It can’t, because no brackets keys, the calculator does have a stack, as per the manual in which (2+3)x4=20 and 2+3x4=14

      Where the fuck does the manual say 14?

      You’d tell me a goddamn abacus has brackets in secret.